Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ken H
Justice Clarence Thomas is entitled to speculate. I'm just telling you the way it is.

"As for case law: I don't recall where anyone has claimed that the States (or the Feds, for that matter) have been restrained by case law on Second Amendment grounds."

I didn't say anyone claimed that. I said that no defendant has ever successfully used the second amendment as protection from some state law. If the second amendment protects a citizen from state gun laws, then where are the cases demonstrating that?

I can cite a half-dozen where the courts have ruled just the opposite -- that the second amendment affords no protection from state laws.

579 posted on 08/08/2004 11:20:04 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 569 | View Replies ]


To: robertpaulsen
Justice Clarence Thomas is entitled to speculate.

Justice Clarence Thomas may do more than just speculate. He may vote to turn current case law on its head.

Did you hear that he does not believe in stare decisis?

585 posted on 08/08/2004 12:00:11 PM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 579 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson