To: robertpaulsen
Justice Clarence Thomas is entitled to speculate. Justice Clarence Thomas may do more than just speculate. He may vote to turn current case law on its head.
Did you hear that he does not believe in stare decisis?
585 posted on
08/08/2004 12:00:11 PM PDT by
Ken H
To: Ken H
Did you hear that he does not believe in stare decisis?I'm not disbelieving you, but do you have a cite for that? (just for my own reference)
586 posted on
08/08/2004 12:02:34 PM PDT by
inquest
(Judges are given the power to decide cases, not to decide law)
To: Ken H; inquest
"Did you hear that he does not believe in stare decisis?"Wouldn't that be the definition of judicial activism? Should USSC Justices engage in judicial activism?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson