Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Robert Taylor
What you are saying doesn't quite square with the account in The American Hunter or Randy Weaver's own account.

The government sniper drew what he saw before he fired his shot at her, it was a woman holding a baby.

It was no accident whatsoever, a deliberate shot made at an unarmed woman looking out towards whatever unknown evil men were killing her dog, her son and shooting at them.

He may have drawn a picture after shooting her for a report but I don't see how he could have drawn it before shooting her. She was shot several hours after her son was killed. His body lay in a shed several yards from the house. Randy and the family friend had gone out to see it. (Why I don't know) They were running back to the house, Sandy was holding the door open for them, Randy ran through first and the friend was going through the door when Horiuchi shot hitting Sandy and the baby.

I agree with your legal points.

147 posted on 07/30/2004 9:50:30 AM PDT by TigersEye (Your parents are Pro-Choice? You're lucky to be here!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]


To: TigersEye

The account came from the trial, where a book about it was written by the lawyer for the defense. In the book was a copy of the bar napkin that the government sniper sketched after the action of what he saw when he fired that shot that killed a mother holding a baby. He drew her.

It is damning evidence, and the rules were changed just for the occasion.

It was a government hit team that went on an ordered killing spree that day.


152 posted on 07/30/2004 9:54:26 AM PDT by Robert Taylor (Yeah though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, Glock and Benchmade they comfort me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson