The account came from the trial, where a book about it was written by the lawyer for the defense. In the book was a copy of the bar napkin that the government sniper sketched after the action of what he saw when he fired that shot that killed a mother holding a baby. He drew her.
It is damning evidence, and the rules were changed just for the occasion.
It was a government hit team that went on an ordered killing spree that day.
My point exactly. Whether he intended to hit the friend or Sandy doesn't mitigate the action. The rule that was suspended was that they had to take fire first before returning fire. Definitely wrong. She wasn't watching them shoot her son and dog though. That happened much earlier and some distance from the house in the woods.