Voters need to think about this.
Had President Kerry been in office on 9/11, Ive no doubt there would have been far more UN resolutions, and joint declarations, and beaming faces announcing great progress at Nato summits, and G8, and EU and Apec. But Saddam would still be in power, and so would the Taleban, and no doubt in the latter case, under an agreement brokered by Kerry special envoy Jimmy Carter, Washington would be bankrolling the regime in return for pledges to phase out the terrorist training camps. The senator gives no indication that hes up to the challenges of the age.
And doesn't that bankroll statement describe exactly how the Clinton administration handled North Korea? We hear a small whine now and then about "why didn't GWB invade NK instead?" but it is a small whine since the answer is "Clinton let them build the bomb."
Kerry must not be allowed near the White House.