Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Junior
I can see a definite use for this thing for paroled criminals

"The technology will insidiously insert itself into the system, first in smaller ways, then in larger ways, until people get used to it," said Peterson of the Arlington Institute. "Then it will become a common and easy way to establish identity."

It'll go something like this (in chronological order):

1. Pets (check)
2. Stupid people who want them voluntarily (check)

Now onto the important part, involuntary humans...

3. Soldiers (Your @__ belongs to the Corps!, and the Corps wants a chip in its property!)
4. Sex Offenders. (It's very important to start with them, because those opposed can be portreyed as sympathetic to perverts: "Besides, soldiers have them! Do you think molesters are above soldiers!?")
3. People on parole/probation (no chip? serve your time!)
4. All prisoners
6. Anyone arrested

Next is the hard part, people who haven't been accused of breaking the law:

7. Anyone who works with children
8. Anyone who wants a professional license
9. Anyone who wants a drivers license
10. Anyone who wants a job

This is all as predictible as tomorrow mornings sunrise.

16 posted on 07/28/2004 2:25:30 PM PDT by freeeee ("Owning" property in the US just means you have one less landlord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: freeeee
Methinks you're getting panicky without reason. We already have ankle bracelets for in-house arrestees. Gee, I don't see the government mandating children (or anyone else, for that matter) should wear them.

Civil Libertarians would have fits if non-law breakers were required to get chipped. Hell, they'll probably have fits about mandating them for parolees.

There are a lot more despotic places in this world than the U.S., and I don't see their leaderships sniffing around these chip companies.

20 posted on 07/28/2004 2:30:26 PM PDT by Junior (FABRICATI DIEM, PVNC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: freeeee

11. Newborns. There'll be a kidnapping of an unchipped child, and then "Robin Chris's law" will be passed making NOT chipping a baby proof of neglect.


23 posted on 07/28/2004 2:44:13 PM PDT by kaylar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: freeeee
Next is the hard part, people who haven't been accused of breaking the law:

That's easy - just sell it to them as a "convenient" way to pay with their credit card. All you have to do is swipe your hand under the scanner ...

24 posted on 07/28/2004 2:46:46 PM PDT by valkyrieanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: freeeee

I for one, think you have hit the nail squarely on the head.


58 posted on 07/28/2004 3:44:26 PM PDT by porte des morts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: freeeee

Your reply 16 just about sums it up.


66 posted on 07/28/2004 11:51:09 PM PDT by Travis McGee (----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: freeeee

that's a good summary of the expected progression


82 posted on 07/29/2004 5:50:31 PM PDT by webstersII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson