Believe it or not, the response to the release of this photo, when set next to the Sandy Berger 'leak', reveal something about the Democrats.
It seems that when the media gets a story that is critical of Republicans it is just good investigative journalism. The Democrats seem to think that any story (or photo) that is critical of them is a leak. Hmmmmmmmm. . . . .
In other words, the Democrats are inadvertantly confessing to their relationship with the major media; they believe that the media doesn't investigate Democrats; they think critical stories are only the result of the vast right wing conspiracy 'leaking' stories and photos.
the Democrats are inadvertantly confessing to their relationship with the major media... Ah, but the media does have fun piling on when they smell blood! And the dam may be starting to crack...
The most UNFORTUNATE thing though, is that WHEN this wabbit takes a nosedive, we will THEN get "Hilla the Hun" and have to start all over!
This per Brit Hume...
Five months after the AFLCIO endorsed John Kerry for president, the head of the AFLCIO's LARGEST union, said today that "the democratic party may be better in the long run if Kerry LOSES in November.
The president of the Service Employees International Union, Andrew Stern, said the CURRENT democratic party is quote a ""hollow party, and if John Kerry becomes president he would use the Democratic party for his own political gain, and hurt chances of REFORMING the party"".
Stern, in an interview with the Washington Post says democrats are in quote ""Deep Crisis"".
No doubt, when the Wabbit sinks low enough, SOMEONE will suggest swapping the candidates THIS YEAR...
But then the question looms, when, and how?
Marcy Park?
Toricelli?
Ron Brown?
I think the Clintons pushing Wes Clark out there last fall was a test of how well a "new candidate" holds up in the "honeymoon period".
Unions might be better off with Kerry loss, leader says