>>Forgive me if my suspicion if inaccurate, but you've shown wild enthusiam for Obama.<<
Uhm, no. Not hardly. I said he gave a GREAT speech.
I read up on his politics and found him to be a leftist. I don't agree with that. My point is that if we had to tolerate a lefty in office, he'd be better than Kerry.
I am not now, nor ever going to suggest that we elect or support lefty redistributionists into office. My point is that he's a lesser evil.
Furthermore, to suggest I'm giving this douchebag "wild enthusiam" is a misguided attempt to slander me. I DON'T like him. He gave a GREAT speech. Did you watch it? I wish Bush could give such a speech. It'd seal his re-election. This guy nailed it.
Why does that question my conservatism to recognize it? *boogles*
It isn't your acknowledgement that it was a good speech that aroused suspicion.
In one statement you state you are in agreement with him on several statements he made, though you failed to offer specifics. Then you state he is a leftist and are in disagreement.
You stated if it was Kerry vs. Obama you would vote for Obama. That Obama would win if he were the candidate against Bush. Very little is known about Obama so I find the praise extravagant as well as dangerous.
You qualified you were to the right of Reagan, usually done to establish conservative credentials.
Then stated race wasn't an issue for you, which struck me as odd since race isn't an issue for most people on this forum.
As I said, if I'm wrong I apologize. Your response struck me as odd, still does.