It isn't your acknowledgement that it was a good speech that aroused suspicion.
In one statement you state you are in agreement with him on several statements he made, though you failed to offer specifics. Then you state he is a leftist and are in disagreement.
You stated if it was Kerry vs. Obama you would vote for Obama. That Obama would win if he were the candidate against Bush. Very little is known about Obama so I find the praise extravagant as well as dangerous.
You qualified you were to the right of Reagan, usually done to establish conservative credentials.
Then stated race wasn't an issue for you, which struck me as odd since race isn't an issue for most people on this forum.
As I said, if I'm wrong I apologize. Your response struck me as odd, still does.
I agree with the many here who were impressed by him. His speech was VERY strong. Even conservative commentators on Fox were wowed. Whether we agree on the issues or not is largely irrelevant. Much of politics is in the presentation and his presentation is impressive. He shouldn't be underestimated.
You know.
I had a whole page typed out.
Fact is, I support GWB for re-election.
I was talking about hypotheticals. In all cases, I'd prefer a Texan over a douchebag from Mass.
If you think I'm a lib, go ahead. I got years to prove you wrong. I got 18 months of history to disprove it now, but I'm patient enough to give you 5 years. If I'm not dead in 2009, I want an apology from you for suggesting that I want a god damn commie to hold the highest office in the USA.