Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Happygal; All
What's usually overlooked in cases like this is one very basic, irrefutable fact: The Fourth Amendment is not open for negotiation.

This is not like an airport, in which people are screened for security purposes when they enter the terminal. The random inspection of handbags doesn't just apply to convention attendees in Boston -- it's being done to anyone who takes an MBTA train to the vicinity of the convention site.

If there is a legitimate reason to believe that there are major security concerns at a large gathering like this, the solution is not a large-scale abrogation of the Fourth Amendment . . . instead, they should just cancel the event, or hold it someplace where the general public will not be bothered.

13 posted on 07/27/2004 6:13:34 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Ego numquam pronunciare mendacium . . . sed ego sum homo indomitus")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child
Yeah, okay. Fair point.

It is an infringement of civil liberties alright, if your purpose is not to attend the convention.

14 posted on 07/27/2004 6:20:43 PM PDT by Happygal (Kerry has a chin that could chop cabbage in a glass!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson