Skip to comments.
Report Expected to Show U.S. Deficit of $420 Bln (nearly $100 billion less than forecast)
Reuters via Yahoo! ^
| 7/27/04
Posted on 07/27/2004 9:48:49 AM PDT by dead
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A mid-year White House report will tout fiscal progress with a projected U.S. budget deficit for this year of around $420 billion -- nearly $100 billion less than the forecast offered five months ago, congressional sources said on Tuesday.
A congressional aide who declined to be identified told Reuters that the $420 billion figure is "what people are talking about" on Capitol Hill.
The budget projection will be part of a mid-session budget report that the White House will be putting out, possibly as early as this week. Originally due on July 15, the document was delayed after officials in the Office of Management and Budget sought extra time to update their figures in light of improving economic conditions that have fueled higher tax revenues.
Bush has been criticized by Democrats for plunging the nation into record deficits after he inherited a surplus.
The president's fiscal 2005 budget blueprint in February forecast a record $521 billion shortfall.
TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-87 next last
1
posted on
07/27/2004 9:48:50 AM PDT
by
dead
To: dead
"nearly $100 billion less"
How 'bout MORE THAN? $101 billion!
2
posted on
07/27/2004 9:53:05 AM PDT
by
Frank_Discussion
(May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather!)
To: dead
3
posted on
07/27/2004 9:53:33 AM PDT
by
Petronski
(BOSTON TRUTH SQUAD: DemsExtremeMakeover.com)
To: dead
I had read an analysis of what a "budget deficit" really means, by Milton Freedman, a long time ago. I didn't really buy it at the time, but the guy was pretty much right. Uncle Milty is a hero.
4
posted on
07/27/2004 9:54:16 AM PDT
by
Paradox
(Occam was probably right.)
To: Frank_Discussion
A billion here.
A billion there.
And pretty soon, you're talking about a lot of money!
5
posted on
07/27/2004 9:55:49 AM PDT
by
AmericanInTokyo
(***Since The Iraq War & Transition Period Began, NORTH KOREA HAS MANUFACTURED (8) NUCLEAR WEAPONS***)
To: Frank_Discussion
The nearly $100 billion smaller deficit is for FY 2004. The proposed $521 deficit is for FY 2005.
6
posted on
07/27/2004 9:56:49 AM PDT
by
KarlInOhio
(Sandy, is that a top secret document in your pants or are you just happy to see me?)
To: Petronski
Just think -- as he told us just yesterday, John Kerry's first act in office would be to enact national healthcare, plunging us into debt by another $900 billion.
In one day.
7
posted on
07/27/2004 10:00:36 AM PDT
by
Howlin
(Free the 2000 Millenium Report!!!!!)
To: KarlInOhio
Oh. Never Mind. [/Emily Latella]
8
posted on
07/27/2004 10:01:35 AM PDT
by
Frank_Discussion
(May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather!)
To: Frank_Discussion
More voodoo, I think it is called. Let people keep their own money and jobs go up, then state treasuries improve, and finally federal receipts increase. I would like to think thaqt there is also an element of better management in Washington, but we will never hear about that part.
To: dead
... improving economic conditions that have fueled higher tax revenues. How in God's name did this thought make it past a Reuter's editor?
10
posted on
07/27/2004 10:14:16 AM PDT
by
Fixit
(www.cafeshops.com/W2004)
To: dead
Carter had a total budget of about $409,000,000,000 in 1977.
11
posted on
07/27/2004 10:15:43 AM PDT
by
Doctor Stochastic
(Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
To: Fixit
Nothing wrong with the statement
"...improving economic conditions that have fueled higher tax revenues."
Laffer Curve
|
Invented by Arthur Laffer, this curve shows the relationship between tax rates and tax revenue collected by governments. The chart below shows the Laffer Curve:
 |
12
posted on
07/27/2004 10:19:52 AM PDT
by
adam_az
(Call your State Republican Party office and VOLUNTEER!!!!)
To: Fixit
Though to be honest he should have also mentioned the tax rate dropping, as the laffer curve demonstrates.
13
posted on
07/27/2004 10:20:38 AM PDT
by
adam_az
(Call your State Republican Party office and VOLUNTEER!!!!)
To: dead; Poohbah; section9; Howlin; PhiKapMom; Miss Marple; Common Tator; veronica
So... George Bush lied again? /sarcasm
14
posted on
07/27/2004 10:23:21 AM PDT
by
hchutch
("Go ahead. Leave early and beat the traffic. The Milwaukee Brewers dare you." - MLB.com 5/11/04)
To: hchutch
15
posted on
07/27/2004 10:25:18 AM PDT
by
Poohbah
("Beware the fury of a patient man." -- John Dryden)
To: dead
"...update their figures in light of improving economic conditions that have fueled higher tax revenues"I can't believe that came from (Kerry/terrorism) Rooters.
16
posted on
07/27/2004 10:27:56 AM PDT
by
cake_crumb
(UN Resolutions = Very Expensive, Very SCRATCHY Toilet Paper)
To: dead
Wow. A $420 billion deficit that's mainly come from overspending and a "no veto" record, and people who call themselves conservatives are gloating about it.
And the ones who aren't can simply say that our guy is not as bad as their guy.
To: adam_az
Yes, but where are we on the Laffer curve? Clinton passed the largest tax increase in US history and revenues went up. W has passed tax cuts and revenues went down.
FY YTD Receipts YTD Expenditures
2000 1,533,369 1,356,829
2001 1,582,034 1,413,088
2002 1,401,499 1,517,811
2003 1,352,680 1,622,396
2004 1,400,288 1,726,905
18
posted on
07/27/2004 10:30:01 AM PDT
by
NC28203
To: Moonman62
That is right Kerry is going to do better. After spending money on Socialize Medicine.
19
posted on
07/27/2004 10:30:20 AM PDT
by
KevinDavis
(Let the meek inherit the Earth, the rest of us will explore the stars!)
To: Moonman62
Cut me a break. It also comes from the fact that we're in the middle of a war.
20
posted on
07/27/2004 10:31:46 AM PDT
by
cake_crumb
(UN Resolutions = Very Expensive, Very SCRATCHY Toilet Paper)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-87 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson