[JOAT]

I can't find anything corroborating the claim that any searches were conducted, or any guns were confiscated w/o consent, or in an improper fashion.

From post 107 link:

The ongoing search for a perpetrator continues to prove frustrating for residents of the otherwise quiet neighborhood near Smith Elementary School. Residents of the 1700 block of Minnesota Street had mixed things to say about the methods police used in searching homes Sunday morning in the aftermath of the shooting.

Terry Wesner said “a couple of shotguns and a rifle” were removed from his home by SWAT Team members after he consented to a search, though officers did not tell him they removed the firearms after they completed their search.

“That’s what makes me so mad,” Wesner said. “They had no reason (to remove the firearms) without a warrant. … I didn’t know they removed anything until my buddy, who’s staying with me, noticed they were missing. I thought you had to have a warrant to take someone’s guns.”

Oshkosh Police Capt. Jay Puestohl said officers “don’t go into houses without consent or a warrant.” He acknowledged consent to search does “not necessarily” mean officers have consent to remove property.

Puestohl also said nothing illegal was done by removing the firearms and that investigators needed to examine them. He declined to say on what grounds officers had the right to remove the firearms, though.

“We’re getting into a lot of legal details if there’s evidence that can be seized. They (the firearms) could be,” Puestohl said. “As far as I know there was nothing inappropriate or illegal done.”

[r9etb]

I saw it the first time, but thanks again.

[steveegg]

Terry Wesner said “a couple of shotguns and a rifle” were removed from his home by SWAT Team members after he consented to a search, though officers did not tell him they removed the firearms after they completed their search....

Oshkosh Police Capt. Jay Puestohl said officers “don’t go into houses without consent or a warrant.” He acknowledged consent to search does “not necessarily” mean officers have consent to remove property.

There's a few things wrong here:

• By the Oshkosh Police Deptartment's own admission, consent to search does not automatically confer consent to remove property.
• Considering there was but one entrance and one exit wound from one shot, there was absolutely, positively NO justification for the seizure of the shotguns.
• Lack of notification of the seizure after a "consent search" ("Consent, or we'll have Miffy here tear off your left arm and Billy here shoot off your right arm.") is theft, plain and simple.