Posted on 07/27/2004 9:46:21 AM PDT by JOAT
TYRANNY ALERT!
OSHKOSH POLICE CONDUCT DOOR TO DOOR GUN CONFISCATIONS
Shooting of Oshkosh police officer results in knee jerk neighborhood gun grab
Oshkosh, Wis. -- Following the shooting of an Oshkosh police officer Saturday night, area residents were forced from their homes, their lawful firearms being confiscated by police.
The Oshkosh Police Department's Special Weapons and Tactics Unit responded to the area, with a K-9 police dog in pursuit of the perpetrator who was reported to have fled on foot.
Citizens' guns were seized through searches of area homes. The police promised to return the firearms after forensic tests proved they were not involved in the crime. The injured officer's name was withheld, but media reports indicate his condition is not life-threatening.
"The message is: Hand over your guns, now!" said Corey Graff, executive director of Wisconsin Gun Owners Inc. "This is a blatant case of guilty-until-proven-innocent and an abuse of police power."
Still, residents in the area are furious about the home invasions by police and what they see as theft of their property. Although early reports are unclear, they indicate a search warrant was issued for two homes, yet additional home owners also had firearms confiscated.
"We want the perpetrator of this crime caught and brought to justice just like everyone else," said Graff. "But that doesn't mean the police should trample citizens' 4th amendment protections, steal lawful private property and enter the home without reasonable suspicion or warrant."
One homeowner in the area said his guns were taken by police, guns that hadn't left his gun safe since last hunting season. Another victim of the police searches -- an elderly women -- reported waking up to officers' searching her home in the early morning hours.
The Oshkosh Northwestern reported, "Residents were not being allowed to return to their homes by press time."
Left-wing media bias.
Either that, or gross violations of the constitution are not "newsworthy".
In one article, the police spokesman stated that they couldn't be sure whether the gentleman, or somebody else, actually fired the shot. As such he's not a "suspect" in the legally binding sense of the term.
In one article, the police spokesman stated that they couldn't be sure whether the gentleman, or somebody else, actually fired the shot. As such he's not a "suspect" in the legally binding sense of the term.
Why do these threads always bring out posters that wouldn't shoot a cop, regardless of how horrendous the crime in progress?
The problem is that these officers will not be sufficiently disciplined. The biggest form of the punishment will be the lawsuit, but that will come out of the taxpayers' pockets, not the officers'.
I would like to see these officers (and their bosses) fired, banned from all law enforcement employment, and required to repay the city of Oshkosh the full amount of the eventual settlement by having 50% of all future earnings garnished.
Then and only then would it serve as deterrence to prevent the next jack booted thuggery.
According to one article, police found a shell casing in Jungwirt's front yard. Search my front yard, you will find many cases. Does that mean I shot them? No. But over the years many have perculated up, and some are in near pristine condition. The police fubared this one.
Further, it sounds like the police executed the classic 'blank search warrant'. In a blank warrant, the police use a blank piece of paper as a search warrant, then later go to a judge with what they want to find already filled in. Note that the search has already happened, and the police know what they found already. If it is taking this long to get a judge to sign it, they have a problem.
Someones going to get fired.
F$%^ THAT ..... there would have been dead cops if they tried that in my neighborhood .....
It would have been WAY past time here.
I was wondering something similar -- why do these threads always bring out posters who are willing to believe an obviously partisan propaganda piece, without first checking the facts for themselves?
The word "sheeple" comes to mind.....
Are you really suggesting that they should lay off dealing with shooting crimes until the 68% is taken care of?
Here's the link to the entire Oshkosh Northwestern story:
Search for shooting perpetrator
Search for shooting perpetrator becomes frustrating for Oshkosh neighborhood
By Jim Collar and Jeff Bollier of The Northwestern
Local police still have no culprit in custody following a Saturday night shooting that left an officer wounded in a south-side Oshkosh neighborhood.
Oshkosh police officials on Monday remained quiet on the progress of their investigation into the unprovoked shooting of Officer Nate Gallagher, who stood outside his squad car at 17th Avenue and Minnesota Street when the round was fired. Investigators Monday combed through a yard in the 1700 block of Minnesota Street and maintained a presence in the neighborhood throughout day.
Gallagher was released from the hospital Sunday after sustaining a gunshot wound to the right arm during response to a nearby underage drinking complaint at 10:10 p.m. the previous evening. Police Sgt. Kelly Kent said Gallagher is doing well.
Kent, however, wouldnt discuss details of the investigation or any suspects. He said detectives have made progress and continue to actively follow leads.
The ongoing search for a perpetrator continues to prove frustrating for residents of the otherwise quiet neighborhood near Smith Elementary School. Residents of the 1700 block of Minnesota Street had mixed things to say about the methods police used in searching homes Sunday morning in the aftermath of the shooting.
Terry Wesner said a couple of shotguns and a rifle were removed from his home by SWAT Team members after he consented to a search, though officers did not tell him they removed the firearms after they completed their search.
Thats what makes me so mad, Wesner said. They had no reason (to remove the firearms) without a warrant. I didnt know they removed anything until my buddy, whos staying with me, noticed they were missing. I thought you had to have a warrant to take someones guns.
Oshkosh Police Capt. Jay Puestohl said officers dont go into houses without consent or a warrant. He acknowledged consent to search does not necessarily mean officers have consent to remove property.
Puestohl also said nothing illegal was done by removing the firearms and that investigators needed to examine them. He declined to say on what grounds officers had the right to remove the firearms, though.
Were getting into a lot of legal details if theres evidence that can be seized. They (the firearms) could be, Puestohl said. As far as I know there was nothing inappropriate or illegal done.
Martin Gruberg, president of the local chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union, said some of the stories hes heard from the neighborhood at least raise questions of whether rights were violated by investigating police.
Search warrants are specific, and include information on why police are there and what theyre looking for, Gruberg said. If you give police consent to search, does that give them the right to come in, rummage around and take things? Im not sure.
Gruberg said neighbors might have felt compelled to offer consent whether or not they were comfortable with a search because they didnt want to give the appearance that they had something to hide.
Ron Kendall, a resident of the 1700 block of Minnesota Street, said residents of the house that has become the focus of the police investigation refused to consent to a search without a warrant.
He suspects its a reason why police are giving the home so much attention.
Detectives, who went to the home with a search warrant Sunday morning, were seen using a metal detector, sweeping through grass and cutting down shrubs and branches in the front yard Monday evening. Puestohl declined to say whether officers pursued the warrant because the residents refused a consent search.
Details of the search, probable cause for the search or any items taken from the home werent available on Monday. Court records show that one occupant of the home has no criminal record, while the other occupants record is limited to non-violent misdemeanor convictions.
Kendall said officers have shown neighbors disrespect during their investigation.
I can understand: Its one of their own, but theyve been downright rude to us, Kendall said. You dont treat so-called civilians this way.
Doris Eichel was another 1700 block resident whose house was searched, but she said officers were very polite.
Because if stuff like that happens to certain people that value their freedom and their rights ... there will be people hurt.
Sometimes the only place you're gonna find justice is a holster.
And make no mistake, I DREAD the day when this inevitable confrontations arrive.
One search warrent for one house. Several houses searched and at least two guns, neither of them used to shoot the officer, seized.
You are OK with this? What am I saying... of course you are. Nothing the cops do is above reproach for people like you.
This incident has made it around to several other websites as well. As here, most seem to focus on the constitutionality (or lack of same) of the police actions. A few have noticed another thing though.
Does anybody remember the California Highway Patrolman who was shot down as he exited a courthouse a couple of months ago? Like here, in that case every available police officer hit the streets, kicking bushes and shaking trees, looking for the shooter. Why dont those same police forces use similar tactics when an ordinary citizen is shot? Are we to believe that the lives and well-being of police officers is more important than that of the peons? If that is true, then we have devolved from a constitutional republic to something more akin to Japanese feudalism, complete with a Samurai class which holds our lives and property in its hands.
Someday, somewhere, someone will shoot a police officer and as a defense he will claim that he thought the officer was drawing a gun and shot in self-defense. If that defense holds up in court I will then begin to believe that we citizens are truly equal to police officers in the eyes of the law.
I dont think Ill hold my breath
.
The only justification there CAN be is a warrent in a search like this. If you can't get the persons permission, then you need a warrent. Period. Even our current screwed up justice system can't be THAT far gone.
I implied no such thing. Quit your whining.
My post simply pointed out that it is easy to dismiss abuses when they occur to someone outside of a familiar social circle. But when the same (or similar) abuses hit close to home, ones hackles are easily raised.
The folks in the Fox Valley have just had their first taste of what others have long known.
And what's wrong with my HTML skills?
Would you have rather had me post a color picture?
LOL! I love you, too.
You're as busy misrepresenting what happened as the original article. A "house-by-house search" for a shooter on the loose (which is what happened), is not the same thing as "searching several houses" looking for guns (which is not what happened).
The only house that was searched for evidence was the single house at which the cops confiscated a gun, and they had a warrant for that.
In Washington State, if a reasonable person can look at your house and reasonably conclude it looks like you have marijuana plants growing there, the cops don't need a warrant.
The residents gave their consent.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.