I've been posting on this forum for six years now. I would think you would be able to find out what I support and what I don't, but evidently you don't want to do that. You'd rather hiss and moan.
I've told you directly a number of times that I do not think Schwarzenegger is going to be a good governor. Is that too complex a sentence for you to comprehend?
Yesterday or the day before your hot topic was Conservency Preserves. I said that the could declare each of them unconstitutional, confiscate their land and give it back to the citizens. This wasn't good enough for you and one other individual.
I haven't defended this budget process or given Kudos for Schwarzenegger's part in it. I have express my displeasure with the state's tactic of taking too much funds from the local municipalities.
I did vote for Scharzenegger. That doesn't mean I think he was the best man, that I undyingly support him on all issues, or want him to remain governer after 2006.
We've been down this road a number of times. While I do like Schwarzenegger's movies, and him too, I don't think he's the quality of man we need in there. Neither was Bustamante.
On election day, it was Bustamente or Schwarzenegger. McClintock's 14% just wouldn't cut it.
I'm sorry that Schwarzenegger made it in over Tom, but I'm not sorry that he made it in over Bustamante. As for Tom, I think he's a self-sentered idiot.
I voted for Buchanan in 2000, so I'm capable of throwing my vote away. I just elected not to do so this time. I won't be doing it again either.
If I'm going to caste a vote, it's going to influence the electable candidates on election day. This is not about adulation. It's about demonization. I would never waste a vote with a prick like Bustamante running.
Please don't ping me to thread which reveal you haven't a clue as to what I've been telling your for months.
Thank you.
And yes, I'm certain you are now finally beginning to understand how when one sacrafices all principles and sheds the courage it takes to maintain support for one who valiantly profers those principles which, through your switchin support then causes harm to the whole state system of governance... you are bound to become quite sensitive!!!
My purpose in pinging you was not to rub your nose in anything, but to demonstrate how some on here are still defending this caveman as some kind of fiscal conservative with a powerful personality and a Greek-god-like prowess in negotiating skills and vainly hoping he might STILL be someone that will ever make even fiscal conservatives somehow proud!
Your over-reaction to the disappointment of backing Pat Buchanan has really made you still another conflicted conservative and I understand that. Nobody ever enjoys either being, or backing a loser. The only thing worse is backing a winner that will not, or cannot help make things better and enables your adversaries and disables your like-minded electeds!!!
Bustamonte was NEVER ANY THREAT to be elected so bounce you phonograph needle outa that groove without scraping it entirely across the record in a giant squacking sound.
Sincerely, The Waspman and still your FRiend!!!