Skip to comments.
Shortage of bullets plagues U.S. military
The State ^
| Sat, Jul. 24, 2004
| RENAE MERLE
Posted on 07/26/2004 2:44:44 PM PDT by Nagilum
Edited on 07/27/2004 10:48:15 AM PDT by Admin Moderator.
[history]
WASHINGTON The U.S. military has assembled the most sophisticated fighting arsenal in the world, with satellite-guided weapons and unmanned aerial vehicles that shoot Hellfire missiles.
But as billions of dollars have poured into the technology for futuristic warfare, the government has fallen behind on more mundane needs bullets.
TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: afghanistan; ammo; banglist; iraq; military; supplylines
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
1
posted on
07/26/2004 2:44:47 PM PDT
by
Nagilum
To: Nagilum
Talk about putting the cart before the horse. I think bullets are, for now, a little more important than the F-22, for example.
2
posted on
07/26/2004 2:45:53 PM PDT
by
Nagilum
To: Nagilum
Maybe we should do a Freepathon and ask FReepers to clean out their gun safes. That should provide enough spare ammo to keep a few divisions going for a while.
3
posted on
07/26/2004 2:47:32 PM PDT
by
blau993
(Labs for love; .357 for Security.)
To: blau993
Great idea. Better yet would be if I could choose for my tax dollars *only* to go toward military procurement of ammunition.
4
posted on
07/26/2004 2:49:25 PM PDT
by
Nagilum
To: Nagilum
Shortage of bullets plagues U.S. military? Use suitcase nukes.
/sarcasm
5
posted on
07/26/2004 2:50:54 PM PDT
by
maestro
To: blau993
Wal Mart has all the 9mm ammo you need. I buy quite a bit of FMJ ball ammo there for $8.99 per 100 rounds.
That's my practice Glock fodder.
6
posted on
07/26/2004 2:51:07 PM PDT
by
Armedanddangerous
(The first rule of gunfighting is to have a gun...more than one, if possible..)
To: Nagilum
Wouldn't it just be cheaper to outsource all of this to India or China?
7
posted on
07/26/2004 2:54:59 PM PDT
by
glorgau
To: Armedanddangerous
http://www.sportsmansguide.com has about every sort of surplus ammo you could imagine. You have to be careful though. Anytime .308 NATO ammo drops to under .12/rd or so (which it hasn't in awhile) we buy a thousand round crate or two. The British 1980's production ammo seems to be VERY good for MIL surplus. I mean...I hate to suggest that our military use surplus, but hey...if you are RUNNING out of ammo, it will certainly solve a crisis until you can get better supplies.
8
posted on
07/26/2004 2:59:35 PM PDT
by
hiredhand
Comment #9 Removed by Moderator
To: Nagilum
Dead terrorists have all the bullets - blame it on them. :)
10
posted on
07/26/2004 3:00:42 PM PDT
by
Solson
("Ugly knows ugly though." - WorkingClassFilth)
To: Nagilum
How many 5.56 rounds can you get for the price of an F-22. Let's say an F-22 is $100M (low, but a nice round number). Let's say a 5.56 round is $.10, again probably a little high, in military quanties.
That means, for the price of one F-22, you could buy over 1 billion 5.56 rounds.
Military procurement is screwed up, if getting enough ammo is a problem.
11
posted on
07/26/2004 3:04:49 PM PDT
by
FreedomPoster
(hoplophobia is a mental aberration rather than a mere attitude)
To: Nagilum
Praise the Lord and PASS THE AMMUNITION.
12
posted on
07/26/2004 3:05:10 PM PDT
by
MP5SD
To: blau993
>>Maybe we should do a Freepathon and ask FReepers to clean out their gun safes.
You been smoking whacky weed?
13
posted on
07/26/2004 3:05:49 PM PDT
by
FreedomPoster
(hoplophobia is a mental aberration rather than a mere attitude)
To: hiredhand
"Buy two, shoot one, repeat" is my motto.
14
posted on
07/26/2004 3:06:36 PM PDT
by
FreedomPoster
(hoplophobia is a mental aberration rather than a mere attitude)
To: Nagilum
This is terrible. This demonstrates a lack of basic planning. Bullets is not something we should be running out of.
What if we had gotten in a major war with the soviets or china. We shouldn't ever be running out of bullets. We shouldn't ever let the ammo industry get so low that their is only one source.
Of course, my guess is that "shut downs in recent years" has a Clintonian ring to it. Did Gore reengineer basic military supply out of the government?
15
posted on
07/26/2004 3:09:02 PM PDT
by
DannyTN
To: Nagilum
The Armys use of an Israeli company for ammunition supplies has raised concerns among some in Congress. Insurgents in Iraq could use the Israeli purchases as a recruiting tool,
I would TELL the muslims that every round was dipped in Israeli pig fat.
To: Nagilum
Requiring a higher level of marksmanship would also help alleviate the shortage somewhat.
Just my $.02 worth.
Best Regards
Sergio
17
posted on
07/26/2004 3:13:38 PM PDT
by
Sergio
(If a tree fell on a mime in the forest, would he make a sound?)
To: Sergio
Requiring a higher level of marksmanship would also help alleviate the shortage somewhat.
To improve marksmanship, you need to practice shooting. That would take more ammo.
18
posted on
07/26/2004 3:23:55 PM PDT
by
Tailback
To: Nagilum
19
posted on
07/26/2004 3:25:21 PM PDT
by
Coleus
(Brooke Shields killed how many children? http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1178497/posts)
To: Nagilum
Only one U.S. plant still produces small-caliber bullets for the military, sharply limiting the Armys options.Well, if the mohammedans are really looking for a target...
20
posted on
07/26/2004 3:28:48 PM PDT
by
fso301
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson