Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: antifem

Not a surprise, where were the feminists during Clinton's number of sex scandals? Flowers, Willey, Jones, Broaddrick, Lewinsky are some of the women that we know about. It is pretty obvious that feminists look the other way, whenever it benefits them. Feminists need this article like a fish needs a bicycle.


2 posted on 07/26/2004 1:06:06 PM PDT by Mike1973
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Mike1973

Feminists do not care. They are only political.

There is no substance there. They have an agenda that overwhelms any female feelings they might have had.


5 posted on 07/26/2004 1:09:02 PM PDT by LadyPilgrim (Sealed my pardon with His blood, Hallelujah!!! What a Savior!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Mike1973
Not a surprise, where were the feminists during Clinton's number of sex scandals?...

And, I would ask, where were/are the feminists during the Martha Stewart case? No matter what one feels about her guilt or innocence, the fact remains that she was a woman who -- in essence -- pulled herself up my her bootstraps, took on a man's world, etc. etc. You'd think the feminists would rally to her cause on this alone. You know, "Men are threatened by successful, independent women" blah,blah,blah.

11 posted on 07/26/2004 1:30:01 PM PDT by yankeedame ("Born with the gift of laughter & a sense that the world was mad.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson