A disjointed and poorly written article that is FAR below Ann's usual work. She must have been out very late before writing this mish mash.
Some decent lines but, on the whole, I'm in full agreement.
There were a few good lines, but taken as a whole, this is pretty weak for Ann's work. I expect more from her.
I agree. This is Ann's wit on autopilot (still much better than most, but from her it reads phoned in).
A little weak. There are some funny lines in there though.
Still plenty good enough for USA Today.
DOES Bad Andy also have bad eyes - or perhaps a 'bad brain' as well?
I LOL'd several times through that piece - and FULLY ENJOYED it!
I saw logical tie-ins between each paragraph; perhaps you are JUST deficient in your knowledge of 'current events' and other recent happenings by 'the dems' ...
Well did you get the point or are you looking for the Pulitzer winner?
Now, now, there were so many targets it was hard to choose just one or two. Besides, Fat Teddy, Sharpton, Botoxboy, Kusinich...Dean..et al, so many idiots, so little space. Ann sliced 'em up pretty good.
This was written for USA Today. This clip also contains text that is just part of an advertisement.
I'm afraid I must agree on this article....Ann can do a lot better. Of course, we haven't seen what Moore might say....maybe she was trying to get in the first licks.
Shove it!!!!!