Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AdequateMan
Your argument reminds me of the homosexual man who wants to continue to have homosexual relations but persuade others that he obeys G-d.

I am ... unpersuaded.

49 posted on 07/25/2004 7:15:32 PM PDT by af_vet_1981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: af_vet_1981

I think you're missing my point. My point is that if we use our Holy Bible to create our law, then we have no democracy, but a theocracy led by our clergy. What then? There exists little secular reason to deny government recognition. And secular reason is all that matters to me. If we allow purely religious morality to affect the legislature, we better be prepared for the repurcussions that the equal protection laws have in store for us. After all, if you can do it, why can't Mullah Omar?
Explain the difference between a restrictive moralist American theocracy and Iran.


52 posted on 07/25/2004 7:27:04 PM PDT by AdequateMan (Watch it- he's slippery!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson