Skip to comments.
Historic maintenance shed could endanger road project
The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette ^
| July 25, 2004
| Associated Press
Posted on 07/25/2004 12:26:24 PM PDT by Willie Green
NORRISTOWN, Pa. (AP) -- A Pennsylvania Department of Transportation maintenance shed will be considered for recognition as a historic place, an honor that would make it harder for PennDOT to widen a busy highway in suburban Philadelphia.
The one-story brown brick garage, one of 67 county facilities built in 1936 as part of Gov. Gifford Pinchot's campaign to pave 20,000 miles of rural roads, will be the subject of a $10,000 study to determine if it belongs on the National Register of Historic Places. PennDOT will fund the study, which was ordered by the Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission.
The maintenance facility - home to more than 100 workers who care for 776 miles of state roads - stands beside Route 202, which PennDOT is planning to widen starting in 2008. Ten feet would have to be removed from the building's 35-foot-deep lawn, but that change could be prohibited if the building is certified as historical.
(Excerpt) Read more at hosted.ap.org ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: highways; penndot; potholes; roads; transportationlist
Considering the condition of Pennsylvania's roads,
I doubt this building was used for much other than a weekly PennDOT poker game.
To: Tribune7; martin_fierro
2
posted on
07/25/2004 12:26:58 PM PDT
by
Willie Green
(Go Pat Go!!!)
To: Willie Green
Considering the condition of Pennsylvania's roads, I doubt this building was used for much other than a weekly PennDOT poker game.FUNNY!....and true.
Grandma's got a historic outhouse near the road. Will that be an excuse not to widen the road as well?
3
posted on
07/25/2004 12:32:45 PM PDT
by
FormerACLUmember
(Free Republic is 21st Century Samizdat)
To: Willie Green; xsmommy; mountaineer
A Pennsylvania Department of Transportation maintenance shed will be considered for recognition as a historic place "Historic" because someone associated with it actually performed some work. Once. <|:/~
People in Kalifornia complain about the state of their roads. I tell them they haven't seen anything 'til they've driven through western Pee-Yay.
4
posted on
07/25/2004 3:23:26 PM PDT
by
martin_fierro
(Zydecodependent.)
To: Owl_Eagle; brityank; Physicist; WhyisaTexasgirlinPA; GOPJ; abner; baseballmom; Willie Green; Mo1; ..
5
posted on
07/25/2004 3:30:32 PM PDT
by
Tribune7
To: Temple Owl
PennDOT regional chief Andrew Warren called the issue "a public relations nightmare."
"There has to be a point where common sense can coexist with historical preservation," he said. Where is the real Andrew Warren and who is this person whom they have replaced him with?
6
posted on
07/25/2004 3:34:14 PM PDT
by
Tribune7
To: Tribune7
Drivers of Pennsylvania unite! Blow the friggin thing up.
To: Willie Green
A $10,000 study? Where do I sign up?
8
posted on
07/25/2004 3:49:52 PM PDT
by
Fresh Wind
(Uday is DU in Pig Latin)
To: martin_fierro
"Historic" because someone associated with it actually performed some work. Once. Wishful thinking on your part.
To: Willie Green
Why does it cost $10,000 to determine if it's "historic?"
And some say we live in a free country...lol. Morons.
10
posted on
07/25/2004 4:10:37 PM PDT
by
Guillermo
(It's the 99% of Mohammedans that make the other 1% look bad)
To: Willie Green

"George Washington Slept Here"
To: martin_fierro
I don't know why they wanta call that thing "historic".
Hell, it's not even old enough to have a Mail Pouch tobacco sign painted on it.
To: Willie Green
Well, to be fair, that's A PennDot maintenance shed, not THE shed in question.
To: Willie Green
I'm all for preserving truly historic places, but a building built in the 20th century by the govt and used as a maintenence shed doesn't seem to qualify.
14
posted on
07/25/2004 8:39:30 PM PDT
by
VeniVidiVici
(Whoever lights the torch of war in Europe can wish for nothing but chaos - Adolf Hitler)
To: Willie Green
But they sure have enough money to paint big dots in the road, and erect signs to tell you to keep two of them between your vehicle & the one you're following: "Caution! Maintain at least 2 dots between vehicles!".
And to erect innumerable large signs, "Fasten your seat belt for the next million miles!"
And, instead of doing something useful, erect signs, "Caution! Regressive Driver Area!"
ONE visit to PA's roads was enough; there isn't enough shoo-fly pie in Lancaster County to ever lure me back.
Besides, I have a good recipe, now.
BTW did I mention that the above mentioned signs, and others similar seem to not leave any room or money to erect useful, informative signs...like which way & how far to the next town?
Also, the only state I've driven in that designates Interstate exits as "Old Exit #...," still using the destination from pre-standardization, umpteen years ago.
15
posted on
07/25/2004 9:23:19 PM PDT
by
ApplegateRanch
(The world needs more horses, and fewer Jackasses!)
To: ApplegateRanch
Damn spell-checker!
Regressive = "aggressive"
But one may also argue that aggressive drivers ARE 'regressive'!
16
posted on
07/25/2004 9:27:31 PM PDT
by
ApplegateRanch
(The world needs more horses, and fewer Jackasses!)
To: martin_fierro
Where'd you get that picture? Wasn't that from the hiking day on the future I99 near State College?
17
posted on
07/26/2004 4:06:55 PM PDT
by
Kay Ludlow
(Free market, but cautious about what I support with my dollars)
To: Kay Ludlow
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson