Skip to comments.
Really Cool 9/11 Commission's Final Report SEARCH ENGINE
http://www.hillaryforpresident-2008.com ^
| July 25, 2004
| self
Posted on 07/25/2004 11:41:36 AM PDT by christie
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
And check out my Anti-Hillary site. It's my little effort to expose Evita.
1
posted on
07/25/2004 11:41:38 AM PDT
by
christie
To: christie
Please post page 117 to put this in context...
2
posted on
07/25/2004 11:44:04 AM PDT
by
OXENinFLA
To: christie
3
posted on
07/25/2004 11:45:21 AM PDT
by
nuconvert
( Everyone is entitled to be stupid, but some abuse the privilege.)
To: Darth Reagan
4
posted on
07/25/2004 12:10:23 PM PDT
by
marblehead17
(I love it when a plan comes together.)
To: RhoTheta
5
posted on
07/25/2004 12:15:48 PM PDT
by
Egon
(Better to be thought a fool, than to open your mouth and remove all doubt!)
To: OXENinFLA
From Page 117 of the 9/11 Report:
By the early hours of the morning of August 20, President Clinton and all his principal advisers had agreed to strike Bin Ladin camps in Afghanistan near Khowst, as well as hitting al Shifa. The President took the Sudanese tannery off the target list because he saw little point in killing uninvolved people without doing significant harm to Bin Ladin.
The principal with the most qualms regarding al Shifa was Attorney General Reno. She expressed concern about attacking two Muslim countries at the same time. Looking back, she said that she felt the premise kept shifting. 45 Later on August 20, Navy vessels in the Arabian Sea fired their cruise mis siles. Though most of them hit their intended targets, neither Bin Ladin nor any other terrorist leader was killed.
Berger told us that an after-action review by Director Tenet concluded that the strikes had killed 2030 people in the camps but probably missed Bin Ladin by a few hours. Since the missiles headed for Afghanistan had had to cross Pakistan, the Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs was sent to meet with Pakistans army chief of staff to assure him the missiles were not coming from India.
Officials in Washington speculated that one or another Pakistani official might have sent a warning to the Taliban or Bin Ladin.
The air strikes marked the climax of an intense 48-hour period in which Berger notified congressional leaders, the principals called their foreign counterparts, and President Clinton flew back from his vacation on Marthas Vineyard to address the nation from the Oval Office. The President spoke to the congressional leadership from Air Force One, and he called British Prime Minister Tony Blair, Pakistani Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, and Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak from the White House.47
House Speaker Newt Gingrich and Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott initially supported the President. The next month, Gingrichs office dismissed the cruise missile attacks as pinpricks.48 At the time, President Clinton was embroiled in the Lewinsky scandal, which continued to consume public attention for the rest of that year and the first months of 1999.
As it happened, a popular 1997 movie, Wag the Dog, features a president who fakes a war to distract public attention from a domestic scandal. Some Republicans in Congress raised questions about the timing of the strikes. Berger was particularly rankled by an editorial in the Economist that said that only the future would tell whether the U.S. missile strikes had created 10,000 new fanatics where there would have been none.49
Much public commentary turned immediately to scalding criticism that the action was too aggressive. The Sudanese denied that al Shifa produced nerve gas, and they allowed journalists to visit what was left of a seemingly harmless facility. President Clinton, Vice President Gore, Berger, Tenet, and Clarke insisted to us that their judgment was right, pointing to the soil sample evidence.
No independent evidence has emerged to corroborate the CIAs assessment.
To: technomage
Thanks, I didn't want people to think the after action report was after the millennium plot..
7
posted on
07/25/2004 12:34:22 PM PDT
by
OXENinFLA
To: OXENinFLA
Thanks for the info....we need to make sure we have our ducks in a row when we report stuff on here.
8
posted on
07/25/2004 12:35:39 PM PDT
by
rwfromkansas
(BYPASS FORCED WEB REGISTRATION! **** http://www.bugmenot.com ****)
To: technomage
Thanks. I was just trying to show an example of what the search engine output looked like.
9
posted on
07/25/2004 12:41:20 PM PDT
by
christie
(http://www.hillaryforpresident-2008.com -- NOT!)
To: christie
"And check out my Anti-Hillary site."
Great work, christie!
10
posted on
07/25/2004 1:19:13 PM PDT
by
windchime
(Podesta about Bush: "He's got four years to try to undo all the stuff we've done." (TIME-1/22/01))
To: christie
Thanks for the search engine link, too!I don't know if you have this link, but if you're working with Hillary info, you can probably use it. It alleviates a lot of 'HRC' frustration.
Slap Hillary!
11
posted on
07/25/2004 1:35:24 PM PDT
by
windchime
(Podesta about Bush: "He's got four years to try to undo all the stuff we've done." (TIME-1/22/01))
To: windchime
Good one! I'll add it to the site. Hit the site, slap Hitlery.
First time I've ever laughed looking at Evita.
12
posted on
07/25/2004 1:44:44 PM PDT
by
christie
(http://www.hillaryforpresident-2008.com -- NOT!)
To: christie
13
posted on
07/25/2004 2:07:43 PM PDT
by
VOA
To: christie
Thanks for the search engine link, too!I don't know if you have this link, but if you're working with Hillary info, you can probably use it. It alleviates a lot of 'HRC' frustration.
Slap Hillary!
14
posted on
07/25/2004 2:13:04 PM PDT
by
windchime
(Podesta about Bush: "He's got four years to try to undo all the stuff we've done." (TIME-1/22/01))
To: christie
Thought you'd like it.
Please pardon the double post. I met the Domino's guy at the door...had pizza and when I came back to my desk the page looked like I hadn't hit post.
Could we consider it a bump? :)
15
posted on
07/25/2004 2:17:50 PM PDT
by
windchime
(Podesta about Bush: "He's got four years to try to undo all the stuff we've done." (TIME-1/22/01))
To: technomage; RaceBannon; freedom44
Officials in Washington speculated that one or another Pakistani official might have sent a warning to the Taliban or Bin Ladin. Ding ding! It sure rings a bell, doesn't it?
16
posted on
07/25/2004 2:50:36 PM PDT
by
risk
To: Alamo-Girl
This would be a great search engine for The Downside Legacy. I suspect it's not a cheap one, though. Have you considered putting a site search engine on alamo-girl.com. It would be sooooooo helpful.
17
posted on
07/25/2004 3:02:28 PM PDT
by
christie
(http://www.hillaryforpresident-2008.com -- NOT!)
To: christie
For reference:
Pearl Harbor Investigation
For those that are interested in how Pearl Harbor was investigated beginning in late 1945 and lasting till May 1946.
The Knox Investigation http://www.ibiblio.org/pha/pha/knox/knox_0.html
Dec. 9-14, 1941.
The Roberts Commission http://www.ibiblio.org/pha/pha/roberts/roberts.html
Dec. 18-January-23, 1941
The Hart Investigation http://www.ibiblio.org/pha/pha/hart/hart-00.html
Feb. 12-June 15, 1944
The Army Pearl Harbor Board http://www.ibiblio.org/pha/pha/army/chap_0.html
Jul. 20-Oct. 20, 1944
The Navy Court of Inquiry http://www.ibiblio.org/pha/pha/navy/navy_0.html
Jul. 24-Oct. 19, 1944.
The Clarke Investigation http://www.ibiblio.org/pha/pha/clarke/clarke_0.html
Aug. 4-Sep 20, 1944
The Clausen Investigation
http://www.ibiblio.org/pha/pha/clausen/clausen.html
Jan. 24-Sep. 12, 1945
The Hewitt Inquiry http://www.ibiblio.org/pha/pha/hewitt/hewitt-0.html
May 14-July 11, 1945
The Joint Congressional Committee
http://www.ibiblio.org/pha/pha/congress/part_0.html
Nov. 15, 1945-May 23, 1946
==========================
Suggested research path:
General Outline of Orders and Plans http://www.ibiblio.org/pha/myths/jm-097.html
was rewritten in English by the Japanese Research Division, Military History
Section, Headquarters, Army Forces Far East and is based on the translation
of the Japanese original.
Pearl Harbor Revisionism
http://www.geocities.com/Athens/3682/phrevisionism.html
First Order revisionism holds President Franklin D. Roosevelt personally
responsible for the debacle at Pearl Harbor and regards him as having used
the incident as a means to get the United States involved in the War and
subsequently used the Hawaiian commanders as scapegoats to shift public
attention away from the activities of the Administration.
18
posted on
07/25/2004 3:11:01 PM PDT
by
Wolverine
(A Concerned Citizen)
To: christie
Thank you for the ping! There hasn't been a request for a search engine on the DSL since 2000, so I didn't pursue it any further. But I'll do some checking now.
To: christie
I found an absolutely fantastic search engine for the 9/11 Commission's Final Report. It is speedy and detailed.Thanks for sharing that site with us it really is good. Love your Anti-Hillary site.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson