Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

TEXAS TERMINATOR WINS!!!
BadRodeo

Posted on 07/25/2004 11:36:40 AM PDT by Bad~Rodeo

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last
To: csmusaret

I agree. Any blame should be shared equally.


41 posted on 07/25/2004 6:07:47 PM PDT by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

Bump


42 posted on 07/25/2004 6:09:09 PM PDT by new cruelty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NittanyLion

I think you need to recheck when Lance and his wife met, courted, and married. I believe they WERE married when his cancer was diagnosed. They had some of his sperm frozen for their future attempts at having kids. I'm pretty sure they were married with no kids when the cancer was diagnosed. Or they were engaged and dplanning a wedding. I will bet a Dove ice cream bar that he knew her very well BEFORE the cancer.
Why a Dove Bar? It's been over 96 every day for over 10 days. I am craving ice cream.


43 posted on 07/25/2004 10:02:21 PM PDT by ridesthemiles (ridesthemiles)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ridesthemiles

I'm afraid you're gonna have to wait for that Dove Bar.

From Lance's autobio:

"I finished chemotherapy on Dec 13, 1996, and I met Kristin Richard a month later, at a press conference to announce the launching of my cancer foundation and the Ride for the Roses."

He froze the sperm for future use, not knowing when he would want it.

Sorry to do it to you, it's hard not to have that Dove Bar...I know. For me, I go for the dark chocolate on vanilla. How about you?


44 posted on 07/25/2004 10:12:44 PM PDT by texasbluebell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: ridesthemiles
No, they definitely met afterward. She was working for a sponsor of the LA Foundation. He parted ways with the longtime girlfriend he had at the time.

I'd suggest having the Dove bar anyway, though...

45 posted on 07/26/2004 4:22:56 AM PDT by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: NittanyLion; All

In the book, he describes himself, as at one point in his life, the "Fed Ex" Man, meaning, when he had to have it (women) overnight. But in other places, he seems to act rather moral, how repulsive he finds that the sperm bank has porno magazines to stimulate oneself and you will find that in the book. I guess, he is a young man, has some errors, some positives; like so many of us, is moreso up to scrutiny.


46 posted on 07/26/2004 8:59:28 AM PDT by roadrunner96 (Wheels are made for rolling, mules are made to pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: csmusaret

I thought, what would be Lance's downfall, was last year, Tour win number 5, that what would be different about that Tour and why he might fail was going to be because he left his wife. His former spouse, also, travelled around with him everywhere even moving to Europe.

Absolutely phenomenol; I'll leave speculation to others and keep my other thoughts to myself.


47 posted on 07/26/2004 9:03:48 AM PDT by roadrunner96 (Wheels are made for rolling, mules are made to pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: LS

So, how do you feel about Ronald Reagan, who divorced a wife with 2 adopted children?


48 posted on 07/26/2004 9:13:09 AM PDT by TontoKowalski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Geist Krieger

Poor GK!! Many, many more folks will read your comments, ignore the rest of the thread and truly believe that they will be the FIRST! to notify you of your mistake. It's futile and funny to try and resist the rolling wave of do-gooders/non-readers that will ping your poor soul. But, you gotta take it in stride or it'll turn into an Arthur McGowan thread.

(I took a drubbing last week for an uninformed and inadvertent--I swear--reference to a body never being found. Well, said body got found, and found and found and found and found and....)

Good luck!


49 posted on 07/26/2004 9:22:31 AM PDT by January24th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: TontoKowalski
As I recall, she insisted on the divorce. Moreover, he didn't have a divorce for the sole purpose of furthering his career. I think it's a mountain of a difference.

This guy has sacrificed everything---and unlike Reagan, whose second marriage proved extremely loving, long-lasting and one to be envied, Armstrong seeme completely incapable of any relationship except with his bicycle.

50 posted on 07/26/2004 10:00:51 AM PDT by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of news.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: LS
As I recall, she insisted on the divorce. Moreover, he didn't have a divorce for the sole purpose of furthering his career. I think it's a mountain of a difference.

I don't know who insisted on divorce in Reagan/Wyman. Nor do I know who insisted on divorce in the Armstrong case. I seem to recall that one of the reasons for the Wyman divorce was Ronald Reagan's increasing interest in politics. (sort of like "furthering his career")

This guy has sacrificed everything---and unlike Reagan, whose second marriage proved extremely loving, long-lasting and one to be envied, Armstrong seeme completely incapable of any relationship except with his bicycle.

I have no idea of what Armstrong has sacrificed. We do know that Lance Armstong declined an opportunity to go to the Olympic Games in Athens because he wanted to spend time with his children.

I am unable to predict with certainty what Armstrong's second marriage will be like, if he has one.

All this is not meant to tar President Reagan, whom I admire and love. It is meant to point out that the TDF threads are innundated with people who have strong personal opinions on Lance Armstrong's family life, none of whom have any personal insight.

51 posted on 07/26/2004 1:35:02 PM PDT by TontoKowalski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: TontoKowalski
I'm just repeating what I read in a book on cycling. All ANYONE has to go on is impressions, and my impression is, if I were a kid, I sure wouldn't want Lance for a dad, or, if a woman, I wouldn't want Lance as a husband.

Now, since you bring up Reagan, I've talked to people who knew him personally, and they said that his marriage was tremendously strong, but that the love between Ronnie and Nancy was almost EXCLUSIVE of the kids, hence some of the alienation. But in his case, while maybe I wouldn't have wanted Reagan as a dad, I sure (if I were a female) would have wanted him for a husband.

Not all people can balance work and marriage/family. But some people like Armstrong SEEM to go out of their way to put personal achievement above family.

52 posted on 07/26/2004 1:38:16 PM PDT by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of news.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: texasbluebell

~Shaking head~Someone once said.....Americans are cynics.....I pose this statement....AMERICA...LOVE IT OR LEAVE IT....You too Michael 2 Cheeseburger Moore


53 posted on 07/28/2004 6:57:40 PM PDT by Bad~Rodeo (One Nation under God)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson