Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: All
LINK
Report shatters conventional wisdom about 9/11
Bin Laden didn't pay for attack;...


Which begs the question, "Who DID pay for the attack?
183 posted on 07/25/2004 9:02:44 AM PDT by milkncookies (Hillary to Berger: Is there something in your pants or are you just happy to see me?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies ]


To: milkncookies; All

PDB 12/4/1998, Subject: Bin Ladin Preparing to Hijack US Aircraft and Other Attacks
The 9/11 Commission Report | 7/22/04 | CIA

Posted on 07/24/2004 9:14:52 PM CDT by True Capitalist

The following is the text of an item from the Presidential Daily Brief received by President William J. Clinton on December 4, 1998. Redacted material is indicated in brackets.

SUBJECT: Bin Ladin Preparing to Hijack US Aircraft and Other Attacks

1. Reporting [—] suggests Bin Ladin and his allies are preparing for attacks in the US, including an aircraft hijacking to obtain the release of Shaykh ‘Umar ‘Abd al-Rahman, Ramzi Yousef, and Muhammad Sadiq ‘Awda. One source quoted a senior member of the Gama’at al-Islamiyya (IG) saying that, as of late October, the IG had completed planning for an operation in the US on behalf of Bin Ladin, but that the operation was on hold.A senior Bin Ladin operative from Saudi Arabia was to visit IG counterparts in the US soon thereafter to discuss options—perhaps including an aircraft hijacking.

• IG leader Islambuli in late September was planning to hijack a US airliner during the “next couple of weeks” to free ‘Abd al- Rahman and the other prisoners, according to what may be a different source.

• The same source late last month said that Bin Ladin might implement plans to hijack US aircraft before the beginning of Ramadan on 20 December and that two members of the operational team had evaded security checks during a recent trial run at an unidentified New York airport. [—]

2. Some members of the Bin Ladin network have received hijack training, according to various sources,but no group directly tied to Bin Ladin’s al-Qa’ida organization has ever carried out an aircraft hijacking.Bin Ladin could be weighing other types of operations against US aircraft.According to [—] the IG in October obtained SA-7 missiles and intended to move them from Yemen into Saudi Arabia to shoot down an Egyptian plane or, if unsuccessful, a US military or civilian aircraft.

• A [—] in October told us that unspecified “extremist elements” in Yemen had acquired SA-7s. [—]

3. [—] indicate the Bin Ladin organization or its allies are moving closer to implementing anti-US attacks at unspecified locations, but we do not know whether they are related to attacks on aircraft. A Bin Ladin associate in Sudan late last month told a colleague in Kandahar that he had shipped a group of containers to Afghanistan. Bin Ladin associates also talked about the movement of containers to Afghanistan before the East Africa bombings.

• In other [—] Bin Ladin associates last month discussed picking up a package in Malaysia. One told his colleague in Malaysia that “they”were in the “ninth month [of pregnancy].” • An alleged Bin Ladin supporter in Yemen late last month remarked to his mother that he planned to work in “commerce” from abroad and said his impending “marriage,” which would take place soon,would be a “surprise.”“Commerce” and “marriage” often are codewords for terrorist attacks. [—]

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1177973/posts


208 posted on 07/25/2004 9:48:05 AM PDT by JustPiper (So much of what we find is Alli hocus pocus Mohammad anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies ]

To: milkncookies
Excellent point! The paint seems to be peeling off the glossy 9-11 report. No 'close' collaboration with Saddam or Saudi NGO's, but yes, collaboration.
OBL was cut off from the family money, and the money comes from 'wealthy Muslim donors'. Like his brother(s)? And the report continues the whitewash of Islam(not characterizing it as a hostile belief system and focusing on the terror group of the day), a position that the TM has conclusively refuted. And the remedies are equally pallid(A Director of the Director of the CIA, a little more slush money to benign sounding projects, bringing in more nice, clean cut Islamic students for cozy chats at faculty teas, hammering governments that aren't good guys, but support our national interest at the time)
And the report is certainly incomplete, not able(willing?)to examine the documents that the disgraced and incompetent Sandy Berger filched from the National
Archives.
It's nice to be back and talking issues,questions and info.
244 posted on 07/25/2004 10:59:24 AM PDT by TWhiteBear (Read the Rules and don't PO the Mods)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson