Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Court: Floridians who have sex changes can't marry as new gender
Boston Herald ^

Posted on 07/24/2004 8:57:25 PM PDT by Jenya

Court: Floridians who have sex changes can't marry as new gender

TAMPA, Fla. - Transgender people cannot marry as their new sex under Florida law, a state appeals court ruled Friday in setting aside a divorce ruling between a man - who once was a woman - and his wife.

The 2nd District Court of Appeal in Lakeland said people who undergo sex changes aren't recognized by their new sex under Florida's marriage laws, which ban same-sex marriages.

It was not known how many marriages the ruling affects since people are not required to prove their sex when seeking a marriage license in Florida.

The ruling came in the case of Michael Kantaras, who underwent a sex change operation in 1987 and then married his wife, Linda, two years later. His attorney, Karen Doering, called the court's decision ``ridiculous.''

Michael Kantaras divorced Linda Kantaras in 2002 and was awarded custody of two children - one child which was his ex-wife's from a prior relationship, the other a daughter she bore in 1992 following artificial insemination.

The appeals court said there was no legal marriage for a Circuit Court to dissolve, and remanded the custody aspect of the case for further proceedings.

``The controlling issue in this case is whether ... the Florida statutes governing marriage authorize a postoperative transsexual to marry in the reassigned sex,'' the court wrote. ``We conclude they do not.''

Florida's Legislature needs to decide if transgender people can marry, the court said. Until lawmakers recognize sex-reassignment procedures in marriage law, the court said, a person's biological sex at birth is what must be considered when determining if a marriage is valid.

Doering, who practices law for the National Center for Lesbian Rights and Tampa-based Equality Florida, said she would ask the appeals court to send the case on to Florida Supreme Court.

``Michael Kantaras is a man,'' Doering said. ``Michael Kantaras has been a man since 1987 when he completed treatment. This court has just turned common sense on its head.''

Michael Kantaras, 45, has since remarried - a union he's being told is not valid, Doering said.

Attorneys for Linda Kantaras applauded the ruling.

``The law cannot permit a person to change their sex like one changes clothes,'' said Orlando attorney Mat Staver of Liberty Counsel, a conservative law group. ``This case is a tremendous victory for traditional marriage and common sense ... A few hormones and plastic surgery do not change a person's sex.''

The Kantaras case is one of a just a few nationwide where the issue of transsexuals marrying has been considered.

The Lakeland appeals court cited rulings in Kansas, Ohio and Texas and New York and said in all cases the courts have either invalidated or refused to allow transsexuals to marry.

Doering said the appeals court is ignoring the medical community's recognition of gender identity issues as a medical condition that can be corrected only through a sex change.

The medical community recognizes people who have undergone a sex change as having a new gender even though their chromosomes, which identify someone as male or female, do not change in the procedure.

Doering said Michael Kantaras is upset over the ruling.

``This is the state saying he is not who he knows he is,'' she said. ``It's insulting and degrading.''

Gov. Jeb Bush had not reviewed the ruling and had no comment on it, a spokesman said. Legislative leaders contacted Friday also had not seen the ruling nor considered what action they might take.


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: florida; homosexualagenda; sexchange; srs
This story reads like a Who's On First routine.
1 posted on 07/24/2004 8:57:28 PM PDT by Jenya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jenya

You can't "change sexes" through surgery, any more than you can turn a horse into a zebra by painting stripes on it. It's only cosmetic.


2 posted on 07/24/2004 9:00:35 PM PDT by lady lawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jenya
Sorry Janet.


3 posted on 07/24/2004 9:08:29 PM PDT by RWR8189 (Its Morning in America Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jenya

However, the court's ruling does effectively deal with the case of intersexed patients. Sometimes, infants are born with a discordance between their chromosomal sex and their body phenotype.

Some examples:

1. Androgen insensitivity syndrome. The infant is genetically XY (male), however they have the outward physical appearance of being female. They are typically declared to be female, at birth, and are raised as girls. They do see themselves as female.

2. Gonadal agenesis in XY individuals. The gonads fail to develop, and the fetus develops a female outward appearance and develop a uterus. Likewise, they are assigned as female, and raised as girls. They do see themselves as female.

3. Extreme cases of congenital adrenal hyperplasia. These individuals are genetically XX (female). However, because of the action of the excess androgens in the womb, they develop male external genital structure. Sometimes, they are even assigned as male on their birth certificate. They do tend to play in a masculine fashion during childhood. They also have a masculine identity.

It does leave serious questions about what really drives gender identity. Furthermore, it can raise questions about what the real definitions of man and woman are.


4 posted on 07/24/2004 9:36:02 PM PDT by punster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: punster

Doctors who operate on the wrong end of a patient should be liable to be sued. Mental abberations are not cured by cutting off genitals. They still have mental problems.
They are as sick as ever, or even more so, but the doctors got some money.


5 posted on 07/24/2004 10:51:14 PM PDT by tessalu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: tessalu

"Doctors who operate on the wrong end of a patient should be liable to be sued. Mental abberations are not cured by cutting off genitals. They still have mental problems.
They are as sick as ever, or even more so, but the doctors got some money."

If the patient is intersexed, is it a mental problem? Or, is it a physical problem?


6 posted on 07/24/2004 11:05:54 PM PDT by punster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson