Shows how tacky Princess Diana really was.
Agreed. She was sort of pre-Paris Hilton.
IMHO he married her b/c she was young, relatively pretty,not overly educated, gigglily, and (supposedly)virginal.
Whereas Camilla is/was older (closer to his own age), handsome-in-a-1930's-British-sort-of-way, sensible, and, I believe, a divorcee (widow? Either way, she was an unsealed package, shall we say?).