Skip to comments.
Diana 'Took Charles to Cleaners' in Divorce, Says His Banker
The Telegraph ^
| July 25, 2004
| Chris Logan and Andrew Alderson
Posted on 07/24/2004 6:24:05 PM PDT by quidnunc
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-70 next last
1
posted on
07/24/2004 6:24:06 PM PDT
by
quidnunc
To: quidnunc
I might have been able to muster some sympathy, but wasn't it Charles that was caught with his trousers down?
2
posted on
07/24/2004 6:26:28 PM PDT
by
ECM
To: quidnunc
Sheesh. Should've just had her beheaded.
3
posted on
07/24/2004 6:27:22 PM PDT
by
sphinx
To: quidnunc
I believe they are all on welfare.
4
posted on
07/24/2004 6:27:46 PM PDT
by
HuntsvilleTxVeteran
(Liberals are like catfish ( all mouth and no brains )(bottom feeders))
To: ECM
Yeah and the saintly Diana was boffing her chaffer or gardener too.
5
posted on
07/24/2004 6:28:30 PM PDT
by
AmericaUnited
(It's time someone says the emperor has no clothes.)
To: AmericaUnited
Then I guess the tie-breaker comes down to whom was caught first and/or who intiated the divorce.
6
posted on
07/24/2004 6:29:28 PM PDT
by
ECM
To: quidnunc
Well the guy gets 12 million pounds a year, so he won't be walking the streets with a sign "will work for food," any time soon.
7
posted on
07/24/2004 6:29:46 PM PDT
by
Torie
To: quidnunc
Once a twit, always a twit.
8
posted on
07/24/2004 6:30:57 PM PDT
by
Casloy
To: quidnunc
She would be wearing a Burka right now if she were alive.
To: ECM
They were both guilty of infidelity. In a sense Charles has been faithful to one woman, Camilla Parker-Bowles, for something on the order of thirty years. God knows why, but it's so. In a dreadful sort of way it's touching that even an arranged marriage to a beautiful young woman could not rock his devotion to Camilla.
As for Diana, she was unfaithful as well. One strongly doubts she would have done this had she not learned that her husband was still so devoted to his mistress and would never love her.
It was a tragic chicken-and-egg situation: was Charles unfaithful because he was married to a neurotic, or did Diana become increasingly depressed and desperate because her husband was in love with someone else?
I refrain from judging these sad people.
10
posted on
07/24/2004 6:34:44 PM PDT
by
Capriole
(DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY.)
To: Capriole
Thanks for shedding some light. I had no idea (which is probably a good thing) about the length of time he was with the "other woman."
11
posted on
07/24/2004 6:35:48 PM PDT
by
ECM
To: sphinx
i think england should bring back beheadings.
PS i hate the royal family and I hate having to hear about them in the news (though thankfully they havent appeared in awhile, though when DI died i was about throw my tv away). Didnt we fight a war with these people so we wouldnt have to hear about these inbred chinless buck tooth feebs anymore??
To: quidnunc
There's this distant cousin of mine who inherited one of those "Prinzes" titles, and even though she works a regular 9 to 5 job I doubt she'd give it up just for the money. These noble titles are, after all, saleable!
Shows how tacky Princess Diana really was.
13
posted on
07/24/2004 6:37:18 PM PDT
by
muawiyah
To: ECM
"...but wasn't it Charles that was caught with his trousers down?"
He was not supposed to pull them up. Ancient royal traditions and rights of the Crown. Besides, "honi soit qui mal y pense"...
14
posted on
07/24/2004 6:44:24 PM PDT
by
GSlob
To: quidnunc
Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Maybe that's why he couldn't afford the ear tuck and jaw implant.
15
posted on
07/24/2004 6:45:36 PM PDT
by
sharktrager
(The road to hell is paved with good intentions. And the paving contractor lives in Chappaqua.)
To: Torie
Well the guy gets 12 million pounds a year, so he won't be walking the streets with a sign "will work for food," any time soon. Just think for a mere 2 weeks of his pay most of us could set up a nice little trust to retire on. Nope. I'm not shedding any tears for this dweeb.
16
posted on
07/24/2004 6:46:40 PM PDT
by
ElkGroveDan
(Santorum 2008)
To: Torie
Well the guy gets 12 million pounds a year, so he won't be walking the streets with a sign "will work for food," any time soon. Just think for a mere 2 weeks of his pay most of us could set up a nice little trust to retire on. Nope. I'm not shedding any tears for this dweeb.
17
posted on
07/24/2004 6:46:47 PM PDT
by
ElkGroveDan
(Santorum 2008)
To: muawiyah
Shows how tacky Princess Diana really was.Agreed. She was sort of pre-Paris Hilton.
IMHO he married her b/c she was young, relatively pretty,not overly educated, gigglily, and (supposedly)virginal.
Whereas Camilla is/was older (closer to his own age), handsome-in-a-1930's-British-sort-of-way, sensible, and, I believe, a divorcee (widow? Either way, she was an unsealed package, shall we say?).
18
posted on
07/24/2004 6:55:58 PM PDT
by
yankeedame
("Born with the gift of laughter & a sense that the world was mad.")
To: quidnunc
Who gets all that money now? Their sons.
19
posted on
07/24/2004 6:56:03 PM PDT
by
TheSpottedOwl
("In the Kingdom of the Deluded, the Most Outrageous Liar is King".)
To: BurbankKarl
You must not know the Fayed family very well.
They are big time jet setters, and far from hard core conservative Muslims.
20
posted on
07/24/2004 6:56:08 PM PDT
by
sharktrager
(The road to hell is paved with good intentions. And the paving contractor lives in Chappaqua.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-70 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson