Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: The_Victor
For Kerry, losing Pennsylvania would create a virtually insurmountable electoral vote gap.

Then Bush is smart to be targeting it so intensely.

2 posted on 07/24/2004 2:18:26 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Dog Gone
The race may or may not be close, but both sides must design their strategy on the assumption that it will be. It is difficult to see how Kerry could win the election without taking Pennsylvania, and it's equally difficult to imagine President Bush being reelected without carrying Ohio. Expect both campaigns to spend a lot of time in those two states.
4 posted on 07/24/2004 2:26:17 PM PDT by southernnorthcarolina (Past performance is no guarantee of future results... I hope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Dog Gone
[For Kerry, losing Pennsylvania would create a virtually insurmountable electoral vote gap.]

Then Bush is smart to be targeting it so intensely.

And hopefully, Bush-Rove will not bother spending in California as they did in 2000. Millions wasted.

16 posted on 07/24/2004 4:01:33 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Havoc be upon them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson