Posted on 07/23/2004 7:19:49 PM PDT by traumer
another dimwit
Maybe just a bad day....
Autocorrected by DNCSPIN.
URL?
Probably just an honest mistake....
I can see it :
"do you know who I AM!!!??"
FAM: yeah, the broad about to get byotch slapped
sycophant=psychopath
Can't believe the stupid cow thought she could just barge into the cockpit, lol! Even before 9/11, that'd raise eyebrows. Sheesh.
Unfortunate misunderstanding? That sounds like it's from the same lexicon as "sloppy mistake."
As usual, libs think a different set of rules applies to them. (And the fact that Hazel wasn't jailed and charged---she was "escorted" and "questioned"--shows that different rules DO apply to them.)
"is that a state secret in your pocket, Mr. Berger, or are you just glad to see me?"
Geeeeez. Have they all the Clintonistas gone off their meds recently?
DNC Code word for illegal....
Very sad, but very true. Ticks me off. Sky marshals ought to have shoot to kill orders for anyone trying to force his way into a cockpit. Just retrofit the bulkhead and cockpit doors to absorb the shots.
I agree and I don't like it one bit.
-PJ
Well, she got what she wanted, which is apparntly to get off the plane that was getting diverted. Sounds pretty crafty to me.
Mr. Speaker, it was in 1993 and 1994, when Hazel O'Leary was appointed to be the Secretary of Energy by President Bill Clinton, that she overturned the color-coded ID system used in our Department of Energy labs because she thought it was discriminatory. It was based upon the color of the chain and the ID that you wore around your neck, only allowing one access to certain parts of our laboratories. It was the way that we kept people from illegally accessing information that they did not have the proper clearance for. So what happened, Mr. Speaker, was that the Clinton administration did away with that identification process which made it almost impossible for the lab directors and others to know whether or not a person was in a correct area of a lab, gathering information and data that they should not have had.Now, Mr. Speaker, if that was a good decision, which maybe the President would say was the case, why then did this administration 2 weeks ago move to reinstate the policy that Hazel O'Leary did away with? If the color-coded ID system was not necessary, why did they all of a sudden 2 weeks ago tell the labs, "You're now going to put back into place a color-coded ID system at a tremendous cost to taxpayers. That was under this administration, Mr. Speaker.
It was this administration and Hazel O'Leary who decided to put a hold on FBI background checks in at least two of our labs; checks which had been the norm under previous administrations, before people could gain access to our labs, had to be done so that we could determine whether or not those people were spies or whether or not they were appropriately entitled to have access to classified information. This allowed scores of people to get access to our labs, not just Chinese or Asian nationals but a whole host of people who were not being required to have FBI background checks.
-PJ
Thank you!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.