Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: XBob
There are several different stories on that, initially, the Navy was immediately underneath the flight path, and doing exercises; then suddenly the Navy was 180 miles away (according to xlinton announcement), and then that was modified again - that there were a few ships still left in the area.

If the Navy ship was right under the flight path that would place it 10 miles or so off shore. The RIM-67 Standard missile is a hair over 26 feel long and looks like a flaming telephone pole in flight, especially at night. Launching one generates a tremendous burst of flame and a huge amount of smoke. Don't you think someone would have seen that?

206 posted on 07/23/2004 5:22:45 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur (Jefferson Davis - the first 'selected, not elected' president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur

206 - "Don't you think someone would have seen that?"

There were about 200 eyewitness reports, from land, sea, plane, etc. Pilots, passengers, drivers, fishermen, etc. That's why the coverup was so hard. That's why the FBI took over the investigation, and buried these reports, and the normal investigators were not allowed to investigate.

Look up some of the stories in the link I posted.


208 posted on 07/23/2004 5:27:33 PM PDT by XBob (Free-traitors steal our jobs for their profit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies ]

To: Non-Sequitur

Here is just one of the reports on the site:

"CRASH DAMAGE ANALYSIS

Witness accounts uniformly indicate that the “rocket” seen to impact TWA 800 was launched close to shore, approximately 2 to 5 miles offshore. As a pilot in the area, Sven Faret, said, the “rocket” was launched “near the shoreline or in the water.” As TWA 800 was traveling in a northeast direction parallel to Long Island about 10 miles offshore, this would indicate a left, or port, side strike.

As we can see below, the deformation to the finished airframe reconstruction is consistent with witness accounts... "

And here is the link to that individual whole story (one of the many posted on the website):

http://users.erols.com/igoddard/crash.htm




210 posted on 07/23/2004 5:33:46 PM PDT by XBob (Free-traitors steal our jobs for their profit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies ]

To: Non-Sequitur

http://members.aol.com/bardonia2/part13.htm

July 25, 1999 The San Jose Mercury News Author: Scott Holleran
Conspiracy theories attract some pretty loopy people for good reasons- Most of them are based on mere coincidences or arbitrary assertions---in other words, pure bunk. But this is the tale of how I began to believe in one. Three years ago, I was scheduled to meet my parents for the beginning of a long planned European vacation. It turned out to be the start of my journey into one of the great aviation mysteries of our time - the crash of TWA Flight 800.

The TWA terminal at New York's JFK Airport that July 17 was bustling with summer travelers, with whom I waited until my departure. My parents missed our connection, but I was assured by the TWA flight crew that they would board the next available flight, Flight 800. When I arrived in Europe hours later, I exited the aircraft through the plastic vestibule, where an airport official met me with a smile and politely asked where my parents were. I told him they'd missed the flight. He turned white. "Your parents are gone," he whispered as his hand moved to cover his mouth. He explained that their airplane had exploded over the Atlantic Ocean. He muttered one phrase in broken English: "The FBI is investigating."

I learned that the airport official was wrong. Mom and Dad were alive--- they had missed that flight as well---and I was elated to embrace them. We traveled through Europe with a renewed sense of life. It wasn't until we boarded the flight back to the United States that I began to question the government's investigation of the crash, when members of the TWA flight crew told me that flight 800 had been shot down by a Navy missile. This was weeks before an anonymous e-mail message made similar claims, and months before journalist and former Kennedy press secretary Pierre Salinger claimed that a French intelligence source had informed him of a conspiracy by the U.S. government to cover up a military mishap.

"Friendly fire," let alone a cover-up, seemed preposterous to me. As a journalist, I am inclined to be skeptical of unusual claims. I don't read horoscopes, and I think Shirley MacLaine is nuts. As I reviewed early news reports and attempted to match them with later stories, however, several discrepancies emerged.

First, authorities issued several conflicting statements. Second, the anonymous e-mail---though it contained plenty of false information---disclosed that a Navy aircraft had been involved in exercises nearby at the time of the crash. Much later, the FBI acknowledged that fact. Third, I'd noticed that investigators wanted to have it both ways. The National Transportation Safety Board's investigation was proceeding under the direction of the FBI, which was involved on the grounds that a crime might have caused the crash---but FBI Assistant Director James Kallstrom would neither confirm nor deny the existence of criminal evidence.

During the months following the crash, Salinger's amateurish presentations of the missile theory captured most of the media attention--- and ridicule. But the number of credible skeptics grew, and the FBI and NTSB developed an odd, weary demeanor. Investigators' pursuit of an intelligible cause diminished in proportion to the rise in missile claims. The FBI seized an amateur videotape taken by retired commercial pilot Richard Russell, which he said showed radar images of TWA 800 being downed by a missile. Charges were filed against freelance writer and investigator James Sanders, who had obtained a piece of seat fabric that he said contained rocket residue. I wondered why the FBI had bothered with such supposedly meaningless claims---and, once they had, why they wouldn't release the video and seat fabric for independent evaluation.

A mysterious radar track

Then the FBI's Kallstrom testified before Congress that his agency had tracked "all air and waterborne vessels in the area and conducted appropriate interviews. Yet the FBI did not dispute a report by Robert Davey, a Village Voice reporter, that radar in the area picked up four unidentified tracks. One of these, according to the NTSB was within three nautical miles of Flight 800 when it exploded. It's pattern was consistent with a surface vessel moving at 30 knots, the NTSB said. Perhaps most alarming was that the mysterious boat kept moving out to sea, even after the explosion. "He not only doesn't turn to render assistance, he runs," said naval Cmdr. William Donaldson, who believes a navy missile downed the plane. (Note from website author: Cmdr. Donaldson believes a missile(s) downed the plane but believes this was a terrorist attack)

In early 1998, retired Adm. Thomas Moorer--- former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff--- added his name to the list of those who believe a missile destroyed the plane. Basing his judgment partly on an analysis of the flight-recorder data, Moorer and other former Navy brass expressed grave concerns. "All the evidence," Moorer said at a press conference, "would point to a missile." Months later, a former member of the NTSB, Vernon Grose, also publicly cast doubt on the investigation after seeing the flight recorder analysis. Last week, one of the investigation's own military engineers, a specialist in missile technology, told the Village Voice's Davey that he believes the plane was probably shot down by a missile and that the government is covering up the truth. The Voice gave the source anonymity because he feared losing his job. The entire investigation has seemed like an "X-Files" episode.

Streak of light

And there's more. At the time of the crash, 270 eyewitnesses across Long Island reported seeing a streak of light. After the FBI suspended the criminal investigation last year, Kallstrom, in an unprecedented move, asked the CIA to produce a videotaped explanation of the eyewitness accounts that specifically refutes the missile theory. At least one military pilot who saw the crash is unconvinced. National Guard helicopter pilot Frederick Meyer--- one of the closest eye-witnesses, who reported falling debris---rejects the CIA's animated recreation. Meyer described the event as "an ordnance explosion". And he ought to know what one looks like; the veteran pilot dodged missiles in Vietnam. Nearly 100 of the eyewitnesses said streak of light originated from the earth's surface.

A puzzling pattern

In researching the crash and investigation over the last two years, I've spoken with eyewitnesses, victims' families, conspiracy theorists, investigation officials and fellow journalists. I have reached the conclusion that these are not merely arbitrary anomalies emanation from a bunch of kooks. They add up to a preponderance of puzzling, unsubstantiated evidence that cries out for closer scrutiny and begs deeper questions: On what grounds was the FBI's criminal inquiry suspended---but not closed? Have the unidentified radar tracks--- especially the 30 knot track---been thoroughly investigated? If so, why haven't we been told anything about them? Kallstrom and others have focused on Salinger as themissile theory's straw man, denouncing him repeatedly and implying that TWA 800 conspiracy theorists are dominated by irresponsible, wild-eyed Internet users. Hardly. Most TWA 800 conspiracy theorists I've met are retired professionals with years of expertise in their fields of endeavor from journalism and education to engineering and aviation.

Some victims' families skepticism would reopen a wound that is just beginning to heal. But proper scientific inquiry is not passive acceptance of ignorance; it is the relentless pursuit of truth. And the truth is what investigators---despite highly desirable conditions for an aviation disaster inquiry---have completely failed to uncover. Instead, they have asserted repeatedly that the cause may be "unknowable," implying that TWA 800 is doomed to being an unsolved mystery. It is not. I don't claim to know what happened to the 747. But I do know that the truth matters. It mattered to me and my parents July 17, 1996. It mattered more to the 230 crash victims. And it ought to matter to the American public, which has spent well over $30 million for an utterly unacceptable outcome: shoulder-shrugging, ' not answers, in response toserious questions about the worst aviation disaster in U.S. history.

Scott Holleran sholleran@earthlink.net is a freelance writer in Southern California. He wrote this article for [The San Jose Mercury News] Perspective.


213 posted on 07/23/2004 5:46:03 PM PDT by XBob (Free-traitors steal our jobs for their profit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson