Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/23/2004 8:20:37 AM PDT by mrustow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
To: mrustow

What was in Sandy Berger's Underwear?

Don't You think that the title should read

"What ELSE was In Sandy Berger's Underwear?"

Or are we assuming that he's been castrated by the

Clintons ?


2 posted on 07/23/2004 8:25:00 AM PDT by COUNTrecount
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mrustow
Jay Leno had a good line last night. He said Berger was just stuffing his pants so if a hot female asked him "So what was in your pants?" ole Sandy could reply (tugging on his necktie) "It's classified!"
3 posted on 07/23/2004 8:25:00 AM PDT by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mrustow

PDB'S in BVD's?


4 posted on 07/23/2004 8:25:46 AM PDT by RckyRaCoCo (todo su paĆ­s es pertenece a nosotros)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mrustow

Thought for a minute this was from "Men's Wear Daily" which would be strangely appropriate for TrouserGate.


5 posted on 07/23/2004 8:26:26 AM PDT by NonValueAdded ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good" HRC 6/28/2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mrustow

Doesn't the imagery that headline brings to mind make it a little out of bounds? That is just wrong. There are some thoughts that just shouldn't be put upon us.


7 posted on 07/23/2004 8:27:36 AM PDT by tdadams (If there were no problems, politicians would have to invent them... wait, they already do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mrustow
Since the beginning, I've been most shocked by the fact that Mr. Berger claims to have thrown classified documents into his garbage. That means that highly classified national security documents were not properly destroyed and could have would up anywhere, from a landfill to the gutter on Mr. Berger's street. There is a reason why they shred or incinerate those documents to dispose of them.
9 posted on 07/23/2004 8:30:34 AM PDT by Question_Assumptions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mrustow

Excellent article.


14 posted on 07/23/2004 8:34:43 AM PDT by TigersEye (Intellectuals only exist if you think they do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mrustow

16 posted on 07/23/2004 8:37:13 AM PDT by Sloth (We have to support RINOs like Specter; their states are too liberal to elect someone like Santorum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mrustow
It is a nice summary but unfortunately does not also include 9/11 commission member charges Viacom, Kerry campaign "mugged" them which discusses the difference between Clarke's public and private testimony which I believe is also an indictable offense.
18 posted on 07/23/2004 8:38:56 AM PDT by NonValueAdded ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good" HRC 6/28/2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mrustow

A long read, but excellent writing and a very incisive analysis.


23 posted on 07/23/2004 8:45:12 AM PDT by tdadams (If there were no problems, politicians would have to invent them... wait, they already do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mrustow

"It was also Ashcroft alone who had the cojones to point out, in his commission testimony, the role in weakening America's defenses of 911 commissioner Jamie Gorelick, who as Clinton Administration deputy attorney general, erected the "wall" that kept the FBI and CIA from sharing intelligence (yet another matter that Dick Clarke failed to mention in his book). So, I guess Ashcroft wasn't so slow, after all."

I saw Gorelick on Hardball last night, she had the chutzpa to say that the reason why 9/11 happened is because the FBI and CIA weren't talking to each other....

and of course she didn't mention THAT WAS HER OWN DOING!!!

Major hurl moment.


24 posted on 07/23/2004 8:45:45 AM PDT by adam_az (Call your State Republican Party office and VOLUNTEER!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mrustow
Dick Clarke's unprofessional behavior, in not providing the MAAR to the incoming administration, i.e., in obstructing the Bush Administration's anti-terror precautions, is just one of countless matters that Clarke forgot to mention in his book.

Clarke here serves up two significant untruths in a book replete with them. The first is that the Federal Aviation Administration was at "a total loss" for an explanation. In fact, it was the FAA that prompted the meeting and did so for a very specific and frightening reason: Its personnel believed the aircraft had been attacked. As NTSB Chairman Jim Hall would report in a confidential November 1996 report, "Top intelligence and security officials were told in a video conference from the White House Situation Room that radar tapes showed an object headed at the plane before it exploded."

Clarke also deceives the reader about altitude. The FAA never reported an altitude of 17.000 feet – nothing close. The FAA knew that the last recorded altitude of TWA Flight 800 was "about 13,800 feet" as even the CIA animation later admits. In the retelling, Clarke pads in the zoom-climb differential on the night of the crash and attributes it falsely to the FAA.

(Same thread, post #2.)
On Aug. 22, 1996, just before the Democratic National Convention, Ms. Gorelick oversaw a critical Justice Department meeting with the FBI. Immediately after this meeting, as it happened, all serious inquiry into the fate of TWA 800 came to an end.

30 posted on 07/23/2004 8:53:19 AM PDT by TigersEye (Intellectuals only exist if you think they do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mrustow
They counter with "....you have to suspect the timing of the release of this information..."

I counter with "...You have to suspect the timing of the theft.."

32 posted on 07/23/2004 8:56:33 AM PDT by BigLittle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mrustow
They counter with "....you have to suspect the timing of the release of this information..."

I counter with "...You have to suspect the timing of the theft.."

33 posted on 07/23/2004 8:56:49 AM PDT by BigLittle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mrustow
Hey this is a family board. Get out of the underwear and go to what was in his sox. (Soxgate) Limo Liberal nannies have special books they read to their future liberal criminals er lawyers, like the new best selling release, The New Dox in the Sox Book:

The New best selling release for the Dr Seuss Crime Series for young Liberals, "Dox are now in the Sox!" is now being read in Liberal Homes all over America. NEA teachers who can read will be reading it in the K classes this fall. This book is a top seller for Trial Lawyers to start their chilrun on the criminal path early in their lives.

Dox are not in the Box!

Dox are not in the Fox!

Dox are not in the Lox!

Dox are now in the Sox!


43 posted on 07/23/2004 9:21:45 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (Inability to recognize the serious crimes done by the Bergular are symptons of Mad Troll Disease!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mrustow
Sandy Burglar, er, Berger used weasel words like "inadvertent" and "accidentally discarded" to wish away criminal acts that jeopardized national security . . .

I liked the opening lines of a parody that ran in The Daily Farce yesterday:

Sandy Berger, former U.S. National Security Advisor to Bill Clinton, stated today that he inadvertently stuffed national security documents in his cheeks, calling it an "honest mistake".

"The documents just slipped into my mouth by mistake." [snip]

Which isn't a whole lot more absurd than Berger's actual explanation.
46 posted on 07/23/2004 9:31:31 AM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mrustow

Since he took many restroom breaks I guess his new excuse could be that the restroom was out of toilet paper and the only thing I could think of was to use documents. They are safe from prying eyes since they were flushed in the building.


66 posted on 07/23/2004 10:22:13 AM PDT by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mrustow; AnnaZ

Ping. Great article!


69 posted on 07/23/2004 11:01:26 AM PDT by diotima (Telegram Sam, you're my main man)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mrustow

BTTT


70 posted on 07/23/2004 12:39:07 PM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mrustow

"As General Ashcroft testified before the 911 Commission in April, when the Bush Administration took over in January 2001, Dick Clarke withheld the MAAR, until after 911." Uh, clearly, Dick Clarke and the sinkEmperor's regime goons disdain the American people so much that they cared not a whit that terrorists were on the verge of killing perhaps tens-of-thousands! That smarmy little puke should be hanged for aiding and abetting the terrorists. And that would be just the start of the purge to cleanse this nation of clintonism.


72 posted on 07/23/2004 2:10:37 PM PDT by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson