To: JohnHuang2
Perhaps I'm wrong, but it might be interesting if the investigators requested a subpoena for his cell phone records and correlated the calls with the visits and the times he requested privacy.
3 posted on
07/23/2004 12:34:49 AM PDT by
Boomer Geezer
(God Bless ALL of our military and Vets -- past and present!)
To: Boomer Geezer
To: Boomer Geezer
9 posted on
07/23/2004 3:56:24 AM PDT by
beyond the sea
(There's always one to turn and walk away ........ and one who just wants to stay)
To: Boomer Geezer
I'm sure the investigators thought of it but Berger may have used someone ele's phone. If I was going to commit a crime and talk about on a phone it sure as hell wouldn't be my own cell phone.
The thing that I can't figure is why did the NA people just roll over for this guy. Did he intimidate them in some way? Were they ordered by a superior to let him do whatever he wanted? Did Berger think he had the all clear, and from whom?
11 posted on
07/23/2004 4:01:27 AM PDT by
NEPA
To: Boomer Geezer
24 posted on
07/23/2004 5:30:21 AM PDT by
The Wizard
(Democrats: enemies of America)
To: Boomer Geezer
It would be even more incriminating if there are no calls listed during those times.
Would reinforce the evidence that Berger lied, and used the phone call excuse as a subterfuge to get monitors out of the room to steal documents.
46 posted on
07/24/2004 4:28:12 PM PDT by
Liz
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson