Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/22/2004 11:15:23 PM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last
To: kattracks

Please, may Lanny Davis be in the same plane as Hillary and Schumer one day....Along with Teddy and.....


2 posted on 07/22/2004 11:18:24 PM PDT by Wally_Kalbacken
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Scum Lanny who wrote the book on leaking damaging information first to reduce the damages? Of course, he did this all of the time for the Clinton regime. Makes perfect sense.
4 posted on 07/22/2004 11:21:07 PM PDT by ladyinred (What if the hokey pokey IS what it's all about?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
That's it. What we knew. Lanny leaked it now to be able to call it "Old news" by election time.

The worst thing about all this is the horrible stink of the Clintons that has returned. All the same characters are back, doing all the same things. Disgusting.

5 posted on 07/22/2004 11:23:01 PM PDT by Deb (Hey, Sen. Kerry...why the long face?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
It is very obvious who leaked it. The Democrats. Because...

(1) They could not risk embarrassing Kerry at or after the Convention. By releasing this before the 9/11 Commission's report, they guaranteed it would be a one-day story. (Curious also that the AP suddenly released the "new" airport tape)

(2) They leaked this 2 days before Congress goes out of session for 6 WEEKS. So the announced hearings on Berger are now perhaps 2 months away! The news will be stale then.

(3) Kerry is spared Berger's resigning his campaign during the DNC

(4) The Democrats immediately cried "THE TIMING" and every Clinton talking head from Gergen to DeeDee had the full talking points prepared and starched for this release. In fact Berger had retained Joe Lockhart as his temp spokesperson 6 MONTHS AGO. They prepared for this leak long ago.

6 posted on 07/22/2004 11:25:54 PM PDT by montag813 ("A nation can survive fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

If Lanny Davis can't give a straight answer that he didn't leak the story, he leaked the story.


9 posted on 07/22/2004 11:36:59 PM PDT by conservative in nyc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

Thats a good question. I do think it was leaked by a Democrat.


11 posted on 07/22/2004 11:40:19 PM PDT by GeronL (wketchup.com........................www.bushcountryketchup.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

Had I been asked last October by my old friend Sandy Berger - who is a great man, an honest man and has done something that he sincerely regrets - I would have suggested


12 posted on 07/22/2004 11:40:26 PM PDT by wasnova
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Because as sure as the sun rises in the East, Linda, there were enough people who knew about this that this particular week out of 52 weeks in 2004, is not surprising as the week that somebody chose to leak the story.

Lanny, give it up, it ain't going to work.

Tell the rest of your crones the same while your at it.

14 posted on 07/22/2004 11:48:15 PM PDT by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
I KNEW IT! This is what I've been saying all along, that this was a DEMOCRATIC leak. They wanted it out right BEFORE the 9/11 commission report hoping to bury it.

"Curious timing" indeed.

Way to go, Mark Levin. Any democrat that even hints it might have been a GOP leak should be "inadvertently" shoved down Sandy Berglar's pants.

17 posted on 07/23/2004 12:23:38 AM PDT by GLDNGUN (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks; wagglebee; ValerieUSA

Rush Limbaugh: What Papers Were Worth Berger Risking It All?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1176754/posts


18 posted on 07/23/2004 12:33:03 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Unlike some people, I have a profile. Okay, maybe it's a little large...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Kudos to that caller for asking the question and to Linda Chavez for not letting him dodge.

The Clinton machine has been making errors and is looking off its game.

20 posted on 07/23/2004 1:15:29 AM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: holdonnow

Is there an audio of this exchange that can be replayed on the radio talk shows?


21 posted on 07/23/2004 1:49:18 AM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

Are there any laws against leaking such information?


22 posted on 07/23/2004 2:36:53 AM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Maybe Hannity can beat it out of him.
23 posted on 07/23/2004 2:40:03 AM PDT by Glenn (The two keys to character: 1) Learn how to keep a secret. 2) ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
"...my old friend Sandy Berger - who is a great man, an honest man..."

Lanny showing he's no judge of character.
24 posted on 07/23/2004 2:51:42 AM PDT by dyed_in_the_wool (Why do Al Qaeda and DNC press releases always sound the same?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Protect the country against all ENEMIES, both FOREIGN and DOMESTIC!
27 posted on 07/23/2004 3:30:02 AM PDT by leprechaun9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Lanny Davis:
But I'm afraid if I asked John Solomon "Who leaked this to you?" he would give you the same answer that he's always given me when I asked that question, which is "None of your business."
I suspect this is a dread warning to Solomon. It's what Davis demands Solomon repond. What's not clear is WHO is up for the implementation of the implied "... or else.".

Some clues might be in the audio.

28 posted on 07/23/2004 3:37:12 AM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

Mark Levin nailed this one!


29 posted on 07/23/2004 3:39:39 AM PDT by True Capitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Haven't had caffeine yet, but why would they know of the investigation and then put "The Burglar" on Team John F'n Kerry and then leak the info, if not to derail Kerry? Or, is this to protect the Clintons? Or, is to derail Kerry so Edwards/Evita, Evita/Edwards end up being the ticket? There are so many possibilities. That the Dems leaked seems most likely just going by Lanny Davis' interview. But for whom and why? Is Berger, old-school Soviet, falling on a sword, half a sword or no sword at all?

The Impeached One commented that the timing was interesting and I don't think there is any argument there...but if the Dems leaked, it is their timing so what do they hope to achieve, other than derailing Kerry?
30 posted on 07/23/2004 3:49:26 AM PDT by hummingbird ("If it wasn't for the insomnia, I could have gotten some sleep!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

bump


32 posted on 07/23/2004 5:50:11 AM PDT by RippleFire ("It was just a scratch")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson