Posted on 07/22/2004 9:59:01 PM PDT by Pikamax
spin, spin, spin, spin
Misconduct??????? Partisan this: It was theft from the National Archives that dealt with NATIONAL SECURITY.
Clintonistas have been functionally above the law all long. I have no reason to believe this time will be any different. I think he'll walk, or receive some token punishment so insignificant as to be the near equivalent.
Of course as has been said here dozens of times already, if it was Condy who had done this there would be 24/7 screaming for blood.
Sandy Berger admitted to the purloinment,unlike Clinton and others.
There are eye witnesses.
Hubbel went to jail.
And it all depends on who the judge in the case will be.Clinton is NOT the president;which makes a rather LARGE difference and yet another very good reason why we ALL have to get out there and help to re-elect President Bush.
I just fired off an email to this scumbag paper.
Right, partisan warfare, much like the Democrats waged against Nixon, who only covered up a break in at a campaign headquarters, not a top security reading room.
The Clintons have now committed every single crime that Hillary once accused Richard Nixon of committing. I guess she really idolized the man.
Amazing the Compost which created the mythical Deepthroat to make a third rate breakin such an outrage, Nixon had to resign.
Now we have admitted acts of treason at the highest level by one of their girly boys, and the Compost is mad at the FBI.
What I find amazing is how many Freepers still love the Compost and call it a good newspaper.
In any case, you dipwad bozo, A) Since when is it some sort of sin to ''sell goods and services to energy companies'', except of course if one happens to be a little Marxist jerkoff like you, B) Speaking from multiple personal experiences, any person's security clearances are REVOKED, automatically, you effing moron, when that person ceases to work for the United States, whether due to termination of contract or from a change in administration. In short, Mr. Berger had NO, zero, nada, valid clearances in October of last year, and something is wildly wrong that he was even let into the allegedly ''secured'' section of the National Archives. If there has ever been an exception to this rule, I'm unaware of it, and you will need to cite the person and the date AND the particular level of clearance to the contrary before I'll even sniff your ass on this subject, and C) Nobody, not even a moron like you, does something ''inadvertently'' five separate times, while being completely filmed on videotape.
Berger's a felon, and, instead of even asking to uphold some sort of rule of law and putting this arrogant clown in the graybar hotel for his absolutely undeniable felony, you incoherently try to change the subject to Mr. Cheney's former business associations.
You should have been on the OJ Simpson jury; your inability regarding mental processes would have made you a perfect fit there.
Not that I'm persuaded at all that you CAN learn, but anything not provably impossible is, by definition, possible. Ask yourself (if you've the wit, which proposition I'd be very pleased to lay 2-to-5 against) the same question that Marcus Tullius Cicro asked roughly 2070 years ago: Cui bono?
Who benefits from this document theft and destruction?
Oh, can't quite figure it out, eh?
Not surprising. Had you pegged correctly right from the get-go. Go practice attempting to propel certain renal by-products vertically along a section of woven hemp.
John, I rather expect to see the re-emergence of the saber-toothed tiger before seeing any sort of emergence of journalistic ''ethics''. Be honest; you share this view.
Masterful reply. Simply masterful.
I just checked his comments in forum - I think he was being sarcastic.
I very rarely ''lose it'', but, when I see this kind of absolute bilge, well, I confess...I **LOSE** it!
This chap's just very, VERY lucky that I'm not suffering from terminal cancer (I'm quite sure you take my point here, true? (w!))
Always happy to learn, and best wishes to you!
Well, I was surprised by his vile comment, checked how long he'd been on FR and it was since '98 or '99. So I clicked his profile page and "in forum" for his comments.
They all seemed rational, except this one. So I thought maybe he's being sarcastic.
If he isn't, he deserves your riposte!
(I think that's the right word...)
I'll have to keep my eyes open for your comments!..;-)
After all, we've both seen /sarcasmoff, or an equivalent construct, some hundreds of times, true?
Hey play a little game. Suppose Condoleezza Rice did what Berger did. Now post what you think should be done to her. Don't you hate it when that happens.
Stealing TS docs is a felony. Big time.
John / Billybob
The ComPost runs the DNC talking points a day later. These have been re-worked a bit, I guess they studied the ones from yesterday and tweaked them a bit.
It would be interesting to see if he responds.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.