Let's apply his analysis to Clinton, including - as does the author - things suspected but not definitely proven: Clinton, a man who raped, lied before a grand jury, dropped bombs on civilians without risking our own soldiers, misled the country about the reasons for war, entered business partnerships with convicted felons, transferred sensitive technology to China, secured huge foreign contracts for Enron, sexually harrassed and threatened female subordinates, sent the IRS after political opponents, hired private investigators to dig up dirt on federal prosecutors, committed serial adultery, leaked secret grand jury testimony to the press and blamed it on prosecutors, participated in fraudulent real estate transactions, misused confidential FBI files for political purposes, etc.
Where's the 'Babbling Idiot' alert?
Paul Bass
The cold-hearted faux cowboy who runs the country.
Faux cowboy....ad hominem attack. No value.
The man who'll bomb cities
As distiguished from what president since Carter?
send thousands of American soldiers and Third World civilians to terrifying deaths
Oh yeah, they left is so broken up about our "thousands" of military deaths, when they arent wishing for more so Bush looks bad.
lie
Put up or shut up, document a lie.
endanger the lives of his own CIA agents
Prove it. Even if having her name in the paper endangered her life (which apparantly it hasnt) prove Bush leaked it.
turn our nation's energy policy over to Enron
Well, Enron was crooked for sure, but they pretty much unraveled before W took office. Another pointless, provably false attack.
steal from the poor and hand the treasury to the super-wealthy
Because cutting taxes for everybody somehow steaks from the poor...
pick on gays
Gay Marriage ammendment. Well, that does target gays because activists managed to get a handful of judges with delusions of grandeur to circumvent our constitutional process.
march record numbers of defendants to their deaths without giving them a fair trial
Document one case where Bush denied someone a trial and had him executed. Nonsense. Document one case where a trial was held and Bush passed a sentence of execution. Never happened. If the verdict is guilty and the sentence is death in a fair trial in which Bush has no role, how is he responsible either way? Ah, because he doesnt overturn the lawful will of a jury. He's Hitler alright.
all just to settle scores or grab power and riches for himself and his friends.
Whatever.
bwahaha! no, he DOESN"T PULL ALL-NIGHTERS LIKE THE WEASEL KING!!
Does anyone get the feeling that this article could have been written by a German in 1946 trying to feel good about the holocaust?