Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kerry Anti-Terror Plan Removed From Campaign Web Site After Berger Revelation
Talon News ^ | 7-22-04 | Jeff Gannon

Posted on 07/22/2004 6:31:41 AM PDT by jmstein7

Shortly after news broke that former Clinton administration National Security Advisor Samuel "Sandy" Berger was being investigated by the Justice Department for illegally removing highly classified documents from the National Archives, the presidential campaign of Sen. John Kerry (D-MA) removed its anti-terror plan from its web site.

Republicans have suggested that the information contained in the documents was used to formulate Kerry's policy, but are limited in proving those charges because the material is still classified. The sudden disappearance of the policy from the campaign web site that coincided with Berger's dismissal supports Republicans' contention that the purloined data formed the basis of at least part of the Democratic candidate's homeland security program.

The link to the policy is now defunct, but the original page was temporarily preserved in a Google cache. The Kerry release outlining the policy is also archived on the conservative discussion board FreeRepublic.com (web site).

Key portions of the policy removed from the web site included the following three passages:

-- Increase Port Security and Accelerate Border Security. Currently, 95% of all non-North American U.S. trade moves by sea, concentrated mostly in a handful of ports. John Kerry believes improvements in port security must be made, while recognizing that global prosperity and America's economic power depends on an efficient system. Kerry's plan would develop standards for security at ports and other loading facilities for containers and assure facilities can meet basic standards. To improve security in commerce, John Kerry believes we should accelerate the timetable for the action plans agreed to in the U.S.-Canada and U.S.-Mexico "smart border" accords as well as implement security measures for cross-border bridges. Finally John Kerry will pursue modest safety standards for privately held infrastructure and will help owners find economical ways to pay for increased security.

-- Secure Nuclear Power Plants, Nuclear Weapons Facilities and Chemical Facilities. John Kerry will appoint an Energy Secretary who takes nuclear plant security seriously and ensures meticulous follow-up to any security violations. He would also order an immediate review of engagement orders and weaponry for plant guards, and ensure attack simulation drills be as realistic as possible. A Kerry Administration would ensure that security of our nuclear weapons facilities is a U.S. government responsibility -- not cede it to private contractors as the Bush Administration considered doing. A Kerry Administration will tighten security at chemical facilities across the nation that produce or store chemicals, focusing first on facilities in major urban areas where millions of Americans live within the circle of vulnerability.

-- Tighten Aviation Security and Combat Threats to Civilian Aircraft. John Kerry will close loopholes in existing regulations on cargo carried by passenger flights and increase the reliability of new screening procedures. Kerry will increase perimeter inspections of U.S. airports and work with international aviation authorities to make sure the same standards are in place at all international airports. He will work with our allies to crackdown on the sale of shoulder-fired missiles that could be used in an attack on civilian aircraft, and are sold on the black market.

The Kerry campaign did not respond to a Talon News inquiry about the removal of the link from the web site.

Instead of reviewing documents for the 9/11 Commission investigation, Republicans suggested that Berger used the information from the National Archives to help the Kerry campaign.

Sen. Saxby Chambliss (R-GA) said, "Reportedly these documents related to homeland security and then suddenly we see that the Kerry campaign came forward with what may have been illegal documents. This is sensitive stuff and was a significant breach of security."

"Kerry knows better than to use these documents," Chambliss added.

Berger admitted to removing documents from the National Archives on five separate occasions, but maintains that it was "inadvertent."

Sen. Gordon Smith (R-OR) believes otherwise, saying, "There is a curious connection between the removal of these documents and the Kerry press conference on port security. It's disappointing what people might do as they try to take the president down."

Berger had been the dominant national security advisor to Sen. Kerry and was suggested by some as a potential Secretary of State in a Kerry administration, something that now appears unlikely no matter what the outcome of November's election.

When asked by NBC if he was aware of the investigation, Kerry said, "I didn't have a clue."

Democrats tried to deflect the damaging revelation by claiming its timing was politically motivated.

"Somebody leaked it obviously with an intent to do damage to Mr. Berger, and that's unfortunate," Sen. Tom Daschle (D-SD) said. "I think the timing of all this is curious. Berger deserves the benefit of the doubt until the investigation is complete."

Democratic National Committee Chairman Terry McAuliffe filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for the Justice Department to produce documents about any correspondence with the White House on the investigation. He is accusing Republicans of a "smear campaign" against Berger.

McAuliffe has great cause for concern since two important Kerry advisors have been damaged in the past two weeks.

Former Ambassador Joe Wilson was discredited by a Senate Intelligence Committee report that contradicted Wilson's public statements about how he was selected for a sensitive mission to Niger in 2002 and the results of his report about Saddam Hussein's attempt to purchase uranium in Africa. Wilson represented his investigation as proof that President Bush misled the United States in making the case for the invasion of Iraq. An investigation into British intelligence confirms that Bush's claim was "well founded."

While political reactions to the Berger affair are predictably mixed, there is no doubt that the former national security advisor broke the law. The documents he removed carry the highest classifications for secrecy: code word clearance.

Republican House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-TX) called Berger's actions "just a third-rate burglary."

But former FBI agent G. Gordon Liddy disagrees, calling it a grave transgression against national security. Liddy wonders why the Justice Department has not arrested Berger for having admitted to committing five felonies.

Liddy pointed out that Berger is the second Clinton official to face prosecution for withdrawing classified materials from secure premises. Former CIA director John Deutsch was pardoned by President Clinton in the final hours of his second term and spared from suffering any punishment for having taken laptops with classified materials to his home in 1996.

Rep. Mark Foley (R-FL) questioned Berger's motivation for the thefts.

He said, "What in heaven's name was he thinking? What is so important that he would risk both his reputation and prosecution to remove these documents? What's there to hide?"

He added, "There is no one with his experience who can claim that these are the actions of an absent-minded employee. Sandy Berger knows better."

Foley recalled the final days of the Clinton administration when he said, "And we thought it was bad when they were only stealing furniture."


TOPICS: Extended News
KEYWORDS: immigrantlist; soxgate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 last
To: MeekOneGOP

Thanks for the ping!


61 posted on 07/22/2004 9:44:31 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave

An omen of things to come?

Kerry's post election concession speech, "I didn't have a clue."


62 posted on 07/22/2004 9:45:04 AM PDT by kitkat ("The democrats would rather win the WH than the war." - Tom DeLay))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe

63 posted on 07/22/2004 10:15:23 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP (There is only one GOOD 'RAT: one that has been voted OUT of POWER !! Straight ticket GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
:^D

64 posted on 07/22/2004 10:17:33 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP (There is only one GOOD 'RAT: one that has been voted OUT of POWER !! Straight ticket GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: kitkat

Or, "We have to look at the timing of this leak!"

Of course he knows the leak came form Berger's lawyers, probably at his request.


65 posted on 07/22/2004 10:38:10 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (Inability to recognize the serious crimes done by the Bergular are symptons of Mad Troll Disease!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: rhombus

I guarantee he did. That's why both quotes appear together. The writer believes smart readers don't need to be spoon fed.


66 posted on 07/22/2004 11:00:54 AM PDT by ConservativeMajority
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMajority
I guarantee he did. That's why both quotes appear together. The writer believes smart readers don't need to be spoon fed.

Perhpas but this is the phrase that made me think otherwise..."But former FBI agent G. Gordon Liddy disagrees..."

67 posted on 07/22/2004 11:06:11 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7

as usual...good dirt digging!


68 posted on 07/22/2004 11:28:21 AM PDT by Mich0127 (A village in Massachusetts is missing their drunk...contact the Kennedys with any info immediately!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7
This story is hitting a lot of the smaller new sites and blogs.

Kerry Accused of Using Stolen Security Documents to Formulate His Campaign Positions on National Security
Kerry removes national security position papers from his campaign website on news of Berger documents theft. Site content preserved by online newsgroup. See here (FR making news)

This is from GoGov.com but if you search the net you can see many others carrying the same story and how much attention the Kerry link to this story is getting.

And real news on this story is now starting to outweigh the lame Demo media driven defensive stories about the timing of these revelations.

69 posted on 07/22/2004 11:36:50 AM PDT by BJungNan (Stop Spam - Do NOT buy from junk email.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7; Grampa Dave

Would I be correct in assuming that links to the Berger/Kerry web connection have been sent to Rep. Tom Davis, the Chairman of the House Committee on Government Reform?


70 posted on 07/22/2004 11:41:29 AM PDT by TommyDale ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." --Hillary Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale

Yes, you would be correct -- the information was faxed over today.


71 posted on 07/22/2004 11:55:54 AM PDT by jmstein7 (A Judge not bound by the original meaning of the Constitution interprets nothing but his own mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: BJungNan

Thanks for the info.


72 posted on 07/22/2004 11:56:45 AM PDT by jmstein7 (A Judge not bound by the original meaning of the Constitution interprets nothing but his own mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7
Dox are not in the Box!

Dox are not in the Fox!

Dox are not in the Lox!

Dox are now in the Sox!


73 posted on 07/22/2004 12:19:16 PM PDT by Grampa Dave (Inability to recognize the serious crimes done by the Bergular are symptons of Mad Troll Disease!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7
He said, "What in heaven's name was he thinking? What is so important that he would risk both his reputation and prosecution to remove these documents? What's there to hide?"

If the Kerry campaign goes south, so that Kerry can't run for President, and Hillary takes over - well, I'd say the leak came from the Clintons. This was a set up by the Clintons with Berger, all out to get Kerry.

When Hillary becomes President she will pardon Berger, just as her scumy husband did John. Then the Democrats will go on TV and blame the Republicans because Clinton's security advisor is a thief. And the Republicans will apologize. So what's new?

Then too, Clinton could have been up to his criminal arse in some treason against the United States. Worse than selling our missile guidance system to the Chinese, for instance. Berger could have stolen that proof.

Whatever the answer is, the Republicans won't find it, and if they do they'll turn it over to Trent Lott to bury. He can store it in the boxes where Clinton's perjury evidence was hidden away.

Oh, those lovely Republican FBI files. What a find for Hillary.

74 posted on 07/22/2004 1:23:16 PM PDT by swampfox98 (We are at war! We have been at war since 9/11. How smart do you have to be to understand this?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeekOneGOP

Thanks for the ping.


75 posted on 07/22/2004 7:46:38 PM PDT by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ
bump! :^)

76 posted on 07/23/2004 2:50:44 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP (There is only one GOOD 'RAT: one that has been voted OUT of POWER !! Straight ticket GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7
Just remember, I posted it here first (Kerry Unveils Comprehensive Plan to Fight the War on Terrorism(2/27/04)-Incriminating Evidence? )(7/20/04).

Give credit where credit is due.

77 posted on 07/23/2004 8:45:11 AM PDT by truthandlife ("Some trust in chariots and some in horses, but we trust in the name of the LORD our God." (Ps 20:7))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife

Of course. However, I thought that Grampa Dave and hchutch were the ones responsible for finding it (I just handled the publicity end).


78 posted on 07/23/2004 12:02:00 PM PDT by jmstein7 (A Judge not bound by the original meaning of the Constitution interprets nothing but his own mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson