Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ClearCase_guy

One problem with digitized docs and microfiche - they are more easily accessed and/or concealed by unauthorized people. In terms of digitization, they are also more easily erased.

Physical security of the computer itself is moot if the computer is connected to a network.

Electronic copies of paper originals (i.e.: the notes hand-written in the margins) would be an excellent idea, but not without security risk.


32 posted on 07/22/2004 5:34:17 AM PDT by MortMan (Complacency is an enemy sniper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: MortMan
All your points are good ones. However, government agencies tackle all of those points routinely. SW Development, for instance, for DOD, is often tightly restricted, yet placed on secure networks, backed up, and safe from erasure.

Mitigating the security risks is not easy, and not cheap -- but at Sandy Berger's level, it should be routine. The idea that one guy can stuff a few copies of a memo down his pants and "poof!" all knowledge of such a memo is forever gone is just shocking. I do not know what procedures are followed at the National Archives, and perhaps they are smart enough so that nothing was actually "lost" -- but the news coverage seems to indicate that Berger did some irrepairable damage to the Archives. All I'm saying: relying on paper is barbaric.

33 posted on 07/22/2004 5:42:33 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (The Fourth Estate is a Fifth Column)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson