Replies

I don't put anything past Clinton, either, but again, any conspiracy theory HAS to involve the Bush administration, because they "knew" about it after the fact and did nothing.

It's too preposterous. Who do I believe, Bush and Jim Kallstrom or the conspiracy theorists? Well I have to go with Bush and Kallstrom. If it was ONLY Clinton, I would be more skeptical, but still not convinced.

Time will tell, but I don't agree that Bush has to be involved in the conspiracy, assuming that there is one as I do.

Clinton has had years to cover up this episode. And as the many, many Clinton scandals have taught us time and time again, it's not what you know, it's what you can prove in court.

If people won't talk out of fear for themselves or their families, if necessary witnesses are dead, if documentation is missing or has been shreaded, well...it's just talk...or shall we say, partisan politics. And seriously, Clinton has a willing and able, anti-Bush media on his side to spin anything and everything whatever way their talking points tell them to.

Consider...Sandy Berger hides LOTS of classified documents in his sox and underwear and it's just Sandy being SLOPPY! And the press actually reports this with a straight face!!!

I don't put anything past Clinton, either, but again, any conspiracy theory HAS to involve the Bush administration, because they "knew" about it after the fact and did nothing.

Understood. I have no problem implicating the Bush administration in a cover-up about Flight 800, since this is apparently what they are doing with regard to the Oklahoma City bombing.