Posted on 07/21/2004 9:43:30 PM PDT by RonDog
ping
The most intelligent yack show on the radio dial.
That's exactly it , the press is sup PRESS ing this.
I see the Sandy Berglar case going nowhere. As in the point Laura Ingraham brought up today, the demo's are already squeeling "politics of personal destruction".
This "Trousergate" is a bigger issue than Watergate but the ABCDEFG media will just snuff it,...
faster than you can say Abu Ghraib
July 21, 2004.John Kerry to Tom Brokaw tonight:
Brokaw: "Did you know that [Berger] was under investigation?"Clueless John Kerry...that should stick. - Hugh HewittKerry: "I didn't have a clue, not a clue."
Brokaw: "He didn't share that with you?
Kerry: "I didn't have a clue."
(If you want OFF - or ON - my "Hugh Hewitt PING list" - please let me know)
From the Commission's Web site.
"The Commission held its first public hearing March 31 - April 1, 2003 at the Alexander Hamilton U.S. Custom House in New York City.
The Commission's second public hearing was held on May 22 - 23, 2003 in Washington, DC.
The Commission held its third public hearing on "Terrorism, Al Qaeda, and the Muslim World" July 9, 2003 in Washington, DC.
The Commission held its fourth public hearing on "Intelligence and the War on Terrorism" October 14, 2003 in Washington, DC."
I believe that I read somewhere that Sandy the Burglar made his first visit to check out the documents in July 2003 and continued through the fall.
"A COMMISSION STAFFER said with certainty that no gaps exist in the record, but how could they possibly know this if the Department of Justice still has the matter under investigation and if handwritten notes are involved? Further, if handwritten notes appeared on the originals or copies that Berger walked off with, the commission would have to be certain that the "copies" they have been provided were copies of exactly what Berger took away and "lost.""
Did the Commission itself go and look at the files or did they rely upon what was given to them by those who provided the information?
My opinion is that Bubba was expecting to perjure himself in the congressional testimony. That's why Berger was sent in there to cull the record in advance.
Right, the silence is deafening. I'm just dang mad. It's just not fair, waging a presidential campaign with the whole dang US press on the other side. Dang it!!!! If I ever win $250 million in the lottery I'm going to start my own national newspaper.
Today Show: DC Insider Gergen Shills for Berger;
Hewitt Calls Calif Dems "Humor-Challenged"
The Today Show
Posted on 07/20/2004 4:43:44 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest
Is there anyone more annoying than ultimate-establishment guy David Gergen, the man who has worked for four or five presidents, including Bill Clinton?
There he was on Today this morning, defending former Clinton National Security Advisor Sandy Berger who has been accused of taking classified documents from the National Archives. And what was the source of Gergen's knowledge of the subject? He repeatedly made reference to statements made by "close associates" of . . . Berger! In other words, Gergen was nothing more than a shill for the Berger/Dem party line.
In fairness to Today, they led the show with this issue, and reported that the documents illegally taken were "highly critical reviews of Clinton admin handling of the "millenium threat" - Al Qaeda plans to attack the US.
That didn't deter Gergen, who began by claiming that "it's more innocent than it looks. Berger would never do anything to compromise national security. He is one of the heroes of this country in heading off terrorists attacks in 2000."
Amazingly, Katie responded with sarcastic incredulity: "If he was such a hero in stopping the 2000 attacks, why was the document he took so critical of Clinton admin handling of those threats?"
Gergen claimed that he took only copies of the originals and the the originals were there for the 9/11 Commission to review.
Gergen than went way beyond a mere defense of Berger's honesty and patriotism. He decided to perpetrate a smear of Republicans and by extension the Bush administration. Claimed Gergen: "It's rather suspicious to Berger's associates that the story would leak just before the 9/11 Commission report is due out. He's been investigated for months. A man of utter integrity who served this country well. This is a distraction from the findings of 9/11 Commission."
Couric: "So this is political?"
Gergen: "It has those overtones."
Couric: "Berger has been advising the Kerry campaign on foreign policy - how will this story affect that?"
Gergen: "It depends how it bounces in press. The Washington Post played it inside the paper [surprise!]. If it becomes a front page story there will be pressure on him to distance himself or take aleave from campaign." But not to worry, this "doesn't reflect on Sen. Kerry."
Then it was on to interviews regarding Arnold's 'girlie man' line.
Either some top CA Dems are intimidated by Arnold's popularity, or Dem Senate Majority Leader Don Perata actually has some sense.
He declined to get huffy and offended, saying "I didn't take it as an insult. He's had a good run, has been pretty cooperative. I wasn't offended and he doesn't need to apologize to me."
There was footage however from another Dem leader saying he wouldn't take a phone call from Arnold: "what should I say, 'yeah, I'm the guy who you called a scumbag and a girlie man. How are the kids?'"
Hugh Hewitt, a conservative talk show host who was present when Arnold made the remarks had the following to say:
"The Dems are humor-challenged. They're upset Arnold has rolled them on every issue. His approval numbers are in 70% range, and will probably be in the 90% range after comments. What has happened is an overreaction by Sacramento insiders."He also made clear that Arnold hadn't, the Dem leader's suggestion notwithstanding, called anyone a 'scumbag.'Couric: "Isn't Arnold losing credibility by failing to deliver on his promise of an on-time budget?"
Hewitt: "No, he's delivered on many promises - repealing car tax, reforming workers' comp, etc. Now he's telling Dems they must pay attention to spending, can't bankrupt state."
-- snip --
Couric: "Isn't Arnold losing credibility by failing to deliver on his promise of an on-time budget?"I actually watched the TodayShow this morning (gag) - I'll admit - I sometimes watch Katie to see if she's got her lipstick on crooked, up over her lip - then you know she's having a bad rat day.Hewitt: "No, he's delivered on many promises - repealing car tax, reforming workers' comp, etc. Now he's telling Dems they must pay attention to spending, can't bankrupt state."
You could tell Katie lost the Arnie bashing segment, she was so miserable she couldn't get the Democrat to scream and she was so outmatched by Hewitt.
It was fun to watch. - SunnyUSA
CLICK HERE for the rest of that thread
Of course they're going to bring AWOL back up. The AP is suing for Bush military records. Not Kerrys' of course.
bump
I know darn good and well the latter is the case here. The media will see to it that the scum get away with this AGAIN!
I'm glad to see this comparison to the 18 1/2 minutes of missing Nixon tape. I found myself thinking about it a lot today. I was only a teenager at the time, but it is my strongest recollection of the whole Watergate debacle. The press talked of little else during that time period. Yet, they think they can just ignore and coverup this "Soxgate" and think we won't notice? This is a matter of national security and far more damaging to our country.
It is a smart show. I had wrongly assumed he was a Mike Gallagher type, so I didn't bother to tune in until recently. The man is incredibly bright and has killer analytical skills. He's got a new fan.
Please put me on your HH ping list. One of the best shows out there.
Gallagher couldn't think his way out of a wet paper bag. He should stick to smashing watermelons.
I'd like to be half as sharp and bright as Hugh Hewitt is on his worst day.
Too damn funny!
Hannity is far more entertaining, while Hewitt directs you to give serious thought to his commentary.
They both serve their purposes admirably
Welcome to the Hugh Hewitt fan club !
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.