I have never used the NA, and have absolutely no security clearance, so I couldn't say what their procedure is. Several other posters have said there is video surveillance, and that users are even warned about this.
Regardless, I don't think it will be produced, because as somebody else pointed out, any videos made in that confidential setting would also be confidential. I suppose if this thing actually goes to trial at some point, the videos (if any) could be produced, but I doubt that we'll either see them or know about them until then.
I know what other posters have said. I would love for it to be true.
On the other hand, reporters (my link goes to Byron York who is very reliable) are looking into the Berger matter in particular and all have been informed there was no camera.
Now, while I concede there may be obfuscation, I detect no parsing going on, plus there seems to be no reticence in allowing the eye witness accounts to be reported, so I'm mystified why they'd keep a tape secret while making no secret of witnesses and the details they have to share. I therefore will assume there is no video or camera shots and will be very pleasantly surprised if that turns out to be wrong.