Good reason not to sleep around before you know you can provide for whatever amount of children results, I'd think.
I read this article the other day and couldn't help but think that people like her are proof that the human species is de-evolving back to our slurging, cromagnon recesses of mental iniquity, barbartic yawping and beliving WWF wrestling isn't staged.
The boyfriend wasn't terrified. He didn't want the babies aborted and he had no say. This cold hearted bitch aborted them out of fear of living next to the little people.
Madatory abortion = sterilization
Tie the woman down, cut out her tubes. She doesn't deserve to have another baby.
By the way, the daily radio host he referred to was Dr. Laura.
I have a girlfriend who is and OB who told me in horror about a collegue of hers who aborted his own child when his wife was carrying triplets.
Obviously a husband is also an inconveniance. I suggest he ditch the child murderer. I guess it never occurred to her to put the kids up for adoption?
3000 Dead babies everyday.
I got angrier and angrier as I read this, especially at the whole cavalier attitude of this "mother." The only thing keeping me from hitting the ceiling is my 4-year-old who is beside me on a music keyboard, playing a piece she calls, "The I love You song."
This 4-year-old is my 6th child, who came at a most inconvenient time, and though I was 41, I didn't even consider "getting rid of" her.
Nearly every reason people give to kill their unborns, I could give for one or another of my children, but they are all loved and wanted. Why do some people find it hard to believe that kids are a little more important than small jars of mayonnaise?
This witch needs a good freeping!!!!!
If she'd keep twins, why not eliminate one of the twins (clones, probably, to her mind) and keep the single and one twin. Why not keep all three and post them for adoption. Is she that greedy than she doesn't want to be "inconvenienced" (or share) but *wait* she decided to have *ONE* child? I think she had that one only to use it as an economic weapon over the boyfriend. Besides, it's hip to have *A* child, only the "little people" have litters.
I pity him. He obviously didn't want to lose any of his children but the law offered him no power. And, sadly, WOMEN like this will decide this election and future elections.
I don't know what I would do in his place ... but it might not be very pretty.
There are two threads which began over the weekend on this article. If you haven't read the origianl, it's in the first link. For pro-lifers, you may be disgusted by the callousness of this woman, Amy Richards. Plus, at some point in both threads, there is a link where she can be e-mailed.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1173730/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1173854/posts
This "selective reduction" is remarkably routine following infertility treatment, which often results in multiple pregnancies. The prospective parents are often encouraged to "reduce" the number of fertilized eggs to give one strong baby a better chance. A good clinician can make the whole procedure sound like you're just giving your baby vitamins or something.
This story really should not come as a surprise to any one of us who is pro-life. Once you've got legalized abortion, which requires the belief that the "fetus" isn't human, alive, viable, whatever, these situations are just a different configuration of the same evil. No better, no worse.