Regardless of the methodology of backing this material up - digital, microfilm, etc., the originals are still important. They contain information that can not be reproduced, even if copied. I strongly suspect many are not copied. Berger knew this. He certainly did not do this "inadvertently" as post#13 makes manifestly clear. He realized there was a strong likelihood he would be caught, and something was important enough that he decided to do it anyway. The only question is WHY. I believe Clinton and Berger know. I haven't decided if I think Clarke does. I strongly suspect that the copies missing were those of WJC and Berger himself. I hope we are told soon.
.
Yes, the originals are important.
Never-the-less, the dims must consider us to be totally whacko, because we have WJC coming out saying they are all laughing about it. ie, Sandy Berger is sloppy.
And yes, "inadvertently" is not even possible. Wrong word here.
Nothing gets into anyone's pants, inadvertently???!!!??? Or socks either, I might add.
Glad as you say, some can not be copied.
My wonderment is that as I looked today............the news papers aren't talking about it.
Is there too much news today, just to ignore this?
You know..........wait it out and it goes away.