You do NOT want this to be true. If it is true, then all the worst fears we have considered are not only possible, but all the more imminent. Far preferable would be that President Bush, his cabinet, Congress, and our military have interdicted Saddam while he was only preparing to start building weapons like these.
It would be better that we deal with every ridiculous and trumped up scandal over the WMD one at a time, slogging through one mess after another in defense of our President than for any of this to be true.
We must maintain our composure even if the treasonous and vile Democrats cannot. Preemption is just that: removing threats before they manifest themselves. If this were true, then we are well beyond the need for preemption.
Abslolutely right. I made the same point with the liberal denyers that I discuss these issues with. This is absolutely nothing to gloat over. If this is true, we have a lot more to be worried about than whether or not this benefits Bush politically.
Risk: I hope it to be true rhetorically just to show the rats...but I see your point. However, true or not, I honestly believe the need for preemption has passed anyway. I have no doubt the islamonazis have NBC weapons and will use them at the time and places of their choosing. Hopefully, interdiction will catch them first.
Regards,
~Indie
If these are indeed found in some Iraqi cave, they were more likely bought than developed which makes it nothing good, but would mean their scientist did not take it that far.
Keep in mind most libraries in America have books on how to make an nuke, so this is not too hard to find out, obtaining materials are tough.