Skip to comments.
Berger Quits as An Adviser To Kerry,removed files with highest security level.
WashingtonPost ^
| 07/21/04
| Susan Schmidt
Posted on 07/20/2004 9:39:00 PM PDT by Pikamax
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-108 next last
1
posted on
07/20/2004 9:39:01 PM PDT
by
Pikamax
To: Pikamax
>>Page A01
A section, page 1...color me amazed they did it. Next thing you know, they'll be playing hockey in Hades, and we'll have to break out the industrial umbrellas in fear of the winged swine.
2
posted on
07/20/2004 9:41:09 PM PDT
by
Keith in Iowa
(Michael Moore has made "documentary" a 1-word oxymoron.)
To: Pikamax
And the Dims practically crucified Nixon over Watergate. Watergate doesn't even hold a candle to this. It was about political hijinks not national security.
3
posted on
07/20/2004 9:42:02 PM PDT
by
tiki
To: Pikamax
xxxlinton and the boys were stuffing their pockets as far back as 1998
4
posted on
07/20/2004 9:42:44 PM PDT
by
InvisibleChurch
(I actually did vote for the $87 billion before I voted against it)
To: Pikamax
Berger removed from archives files all five or six drafts of a critique of the government's response to the millennium terrorism threat,This proves it was not inadvertant. It was intentional, and the intent was to wash Clinton of any guilt.
5
posted on
07/20/2004 9:43:41 PM PDT
by
twntaipan
(demonRATs ARE the friends of our enemies, which makes demoRATs our... (finish the sentence).)
To: Pikamax
6
posted on
07/20/2004 9:43:52 PM PDT
by
Samwise
(It all depends on what your definition of "inadvertent" is.)
To: InvisibleChurch

He just got confused when Al Gore explained stuffing socks into trousers.
7
posted on
07/20/2004 9:45:50 PM PDT
by
Samwise
(It all depends on what your definition of "inadvertent" is.)
To: Pikamax
Put this in him........he's done
To: Keith in Iowa
Not so fast.... Read the Kerry spin later in the article:
A Kerry campaign official, who declined to be identified in order to speak more freely about yesterday's internal discussions, said Berger had not informed the campaign about the investigation before news reports Monday night. The official also said the campaign did not ask Berger to step down.
"The attitude here is he deserves the benefit of the doubt, especially given his record and experience," the official said.
Move on; there's obviously nothing to see here. /sarcasm
To: doug from upland
10
posted on
07/20/2004 9:49:24 PM PDT
by
Liberty Valance
(It's a mighty world we live in but the truth is we're only passin' through)
To: Pikamax
And Clinton thinks this is all funny (per Drudge teaser). I bet he is especially amused that Berger didn't inform the Kerry campaign.
11
posted on
07/20/2004 9:50:11 PM PDT
by
Dolphy
To: Pikamax
Ah good perhaps this thing has legs after all...We can only hope...Doesn't it smell like a Web Hubbell fiasco? Sure does to me
12
posted on
07/20/2004 9:53:54 PM PDT
by
jnarcus
To: Pikamax
This just keeps getting deeper and deeper....
Wonder where the NY Times will put this tomorrow...
13
posted on
07/20/2004 9:54:08 PM PDT
by
Sonar5
To: Pikamax
So the WaPo decided to move this to page 1 now...
It only rated page 5 before, I think.
Guess they see they can't bury this one.
To: Pikamax
Berger removed from archives files all five or six drafts of a critique of the government's response to the millennium terrorism threat So much for the, they were only copies, argument.
15
posted on
07/20/2004 9:58:01 PM PDT
by
kcvl
To: Pikamax
I just put on my tin foil hat, and have come up with the following:
The purloined memo's and their antecedent drafts would, at most, be embarassing. And I think the Democrats could isolate the embarassment to the Clinton administration. The press, of course, would bury the story and it would rapidly fade from the collective memory. Why would Berger take this sort of risk to save the Clinton administration embarassment?
The missing documents are feints or red herrings. That's to divert attention from what he really stole and destroyed - probably something that would point the 9/11 committee toward Chinagate, the true and towering scandal of the Clinton administration.
To: texasbluebell
Gee, maybe the LA TIMES will have more than two paragraphs on Pg. 13 Wednesday...
To: Pikamax

Berger's departure was essential because of the serious distraction it posed for Kerry
18
posted on
07/20/2004 10:00:33 PM PDT
by
kcvl
To: GOPrincess
NEVER underestimate the ruthlesness of the Dems. They will steal, lie, misdirect, stab their mother in the back, and take illegals to the voting booth to win the white house. They will sacrafice thier first born, put the country in danger, and sell top secret informaiton to Communist China for campaign contrabutions to win teh white house.
Berger was up to no good, big time.
To: Pikamax
"Even as Berger acknowledged his actions, it remained unclear the degree to which they stemmed from carelessness or an intentional effort to hide and remove the documents"This is such a load of crap. It really reminds one of going back in time to the Clinton years, when they did not even pretend to supply plausible explanations. How in the world could it have been just inadvertent, if there were five or six drafts, each of which were 12 to 15 pages long? That's between 60 and 90 pages of documents, each of which would have had a heavy cover as a secret document. Probably it would be a stack of documents several inches high. There is no way in the world it could have been just an accident. We are being flat-out lied to in a way that shows they think we are idiots and they are above the law.
20
posted on
07/20/2004 10:07:24 PM PDT
by
dano1
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-108 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson