Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: chainsaw
My take is Berger was trying to freshen up the Clinton legacy. They didn't want it to tank any further with damaging information.

Not to throw cold water, but he took copies. The originals were still there for the 9/11 commission to see.

I think he was planning a book, and needed the actual quotes to lend some credibility to it.

18 posted on 07/20/2004 6:15:05 PM PDT by sinkspur (There's no problem on the inside of a kid that the outside of a dog can't cure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: sinkspur
I think he was planning a book, and needed the actual quotes to lend some credibility to it.

Sure Sinky, everybody goes around stealing Gov property to write a book. BTW, what your source for the book info?

20 posted on 07/20/2004 6:22:04 PM PDT by bjs1779
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: sinkspur
Not to throw cold water, but he took copies.

Sink, from the reporting I've heard, what has disappeared (as opposed to what was merely illegally taken and returned) are marked up drafts which were circulated to various department heads for comment relating to actions in re the Millineum project.

I'd say it was substantially more than just copies.

25 posted on 07/20/2004 6:40:29 PM PDT by Ole Okie (John F'n Kerry - the hangnail winner of three Purple Shafts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: sinkspur

When handling classified documents the INFORMATION is what is classified. Original-copy, the security of the information contained in the media is what must be protected. We are at war and sensitive information like this could be very valuable to those who wish to do us harm. The legal description of this crime is : any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense


44 posted on 07/20/2004 8:41:56 PM PDT by gogipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: sinkspur

They were not copies. They were the original documents with initials of the people that read them.


50 posted on 07/22/2004 3:17:25 AM PDT by chainsaw (http://www.hanoi-john.org.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: sinkspur
Not to throw cold water, but he took copies. The originals were still there for the 9/11 commission to see.

How do you know this to be true? Because the media told you?

We are interested in the margin notes and comments on various drafts of a memo. I doubt the Archives has a routine policy of copying this material. Why would they? It's top secret codeword. You don't just fire off copies of top secret information.

54 posted on 07/26/2004 4:03:05 AM PDT by Henk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson