So,sweetie,that appears to be part of what Sandy the sloppy BURGALER destroyed.Hmmmmmmmmm....and YOU are oh so concerned that FR has some dumb policy speech up,which has now been taken down from Kerry's site,though it has been on PUBLIC VIEW since FEBRUARY 27th! And that's just shy of five, FIVE months.So posting it to FR pales by comparison;especially since it isn't still up.
Golly gee and oh my gosh,just HOW are you going to weasel out of all of this? Maybe your dear "friends", Aaron Brown and Fillip Bobkov can help you figure this out.:-)
You need to lighten up. "Tea with Filipp Bobkov" is a joke.
He was a former KGB official who controlled dissent, orchestrated disinformation campaigns and manipulated the media.
You write, "Mark Levin.....said on his radio show...that the 9/11 committee's report says that they got absolutely no...papers about the after reports ( which they DID request!)concerning the bombing Clinton ordered on the al Qaeda camp in Afghanistan,which Clinton then claimed had killed 20 men,but had missed old OBL by 1/2 hour.Now, THIS is important,because there's NO proof that this fish story is factual/contains any truth at all.And Clinton is trying to use this,to shore up his legacy,but it isn't working."
This may well be one of the documents that Berger stole. But the after report on the action in Afghanistan isn't something that Kerry supposedly posted. I think what Berger did was wrong, but it doesn't necessarily follow that Kerry is involved. I suspect that had Kerry known Berger was being investigated by the FBI, Kerry would have dropped Berger cold.
I think it is more likely that Berger was getting rid of stuff that embarrassed him or the Clinton administration.
Or he may just have wanted to work at home. That does happen. Of course if he was frequently "going to the bathroom" with papers on his person, that looks more like he was flushing papers--which is different than taking them to Kerry.
As for Berger being able to "make up" a fish story about attacking Bin Laden, this is unlikely. A lot of people were involved in this operation. The people in the CIA would never testify to some concocted story Berger made up.
People in the Directorate of Operations testified. They aren't going to lie for Berger.