You write, "Mark Levin.....said on his radio show...that the 9/11 committee's report says that they got absolutely no...papers about the after reports ( which they DID request!)concerning the bombing Clinton ordered on the al Qaeda camp in Afghanistan,which Clinton then claimed had killed 20 men,but had missed old OBL by 1/2 hour.Now, THIS is important,because there's NO proof that this fish story is factual/contains any truth at all.And Clinton is trying to use this,to shore up his legacy,but it isn't working."
This may well be one of the documents that Berger stole. But the after report on the action in Afghanistan isn't something that Kerry supposedly posted. I think what Berger did was wrong, but it doesn't necessarily follow that Kerry is involved. I suspect that had Kerry known Berger was being investigated by the FBI, Kerry would have dropped Berger cold.
I think it is more likely that Berger was getting rid of stuff that embarrassed him or the Clinton administration.
Or he may just have wanted to work at home. That does happen. Of course if he was frequently "going to the bathroom" with papers on his person, that looks more like he was flushing papers--which is different than taking them to Kerry.
As for Berger being able to "make up" a fish story about attacking Bin Laden, this is unlikely. A lot of people were involved in this operation. The people in the CIA would never testify to some concocted story Berger made up.
People in the Directorate of Operations testified. They aren't going to lie for Berger.
Well,pet,you really will have to find somebody else to explain all of this to you,as my car and driver are waiting for me,it's my Thursday evening with Henry K.,Bill B.,and the gang,in Stamford.(/sarcasm)
Try reading the rest of the threads on this topic,as well as watching some FNC.:-)
Kerry knew about Sandy,or he's an even bigger moron than all of FR,except YOU,think he is.
I'm rather bored with having the unpaid job of being your dominatrix.Please go find someone else to feed your masochism.:-)