...during 5 visits..
how is it that you accidently do the same thing over five visits?
With a mole working the National Archives assisting, how do we know Berger was the only official doing this?
>>If Berger had been a Republican, do you think the media would give a rats a@@ abouth the "timing of the disclosure?"
If berger were a Republican, the story would have been on the front page of the NY Slimes, above the fold, under a banner headline, and the rest of the national lamestream media would be covering it like white on rice.
I'm having a hard time remembering if Republicans questioned the 'timing' of the Abu Ghraib leak. Maybe that's because...they didn't.
If Berger hadn't been stealing documents it wouldn't be about the timing now would it?
Well, it is a vast right wing conspiracy. They must have all gotten the memo by now.
Another question Berger needs to be asked is, "Is that a file in your pants, or are you just glad to see me?"
I wonder if Dr. Berger has ever stuffed a quarterpounder and a large order of fries into his clothing and shoes during a visit to McDonald's? Yum!
Isn't timing that matters in politics? It's just like a whoopi joke, the timing is the key!
This has been known by the principals for months. It came out during the lull before media scrutiny intensifies for the conventions, but after the 9/11 panel coverage would have raised disturbing questions.
And MOST suspiciously, it crossed the tape exactly at a moment when it would just miss most am newspaper deadlines.
It's the timing of the leak about the leak that's important! Holey socks, Batman, who could have tipped off the press about Sandy's document smuggling?
Yeah it is really curious it took this long for it to get out.
Are they kidding us? These democrats are beyond despicable: evil, traitorous, dangerous, incompetent, power-mad, unimaginably dishonest.
The time has come to destroy these enemies of the United States, just as we would destroy the North Korean ruling class or the Iranian mullahs.
This from the party who had Casper Weinberger arrested on a phony indictment the Sunday before a Presidential election?
Well, what else could we expect? Remember the "memo-gate" debacle a few months ago? I'm sure they think that what worked then will work now.
great question! Add to the list this question: Doesn't Berger's incompetent/criminal behavior raise questions about the competence of Clinton's national security team? Doesn't this prove that Berger was more of a second rate political hack than someone qualified to be National Security Advisor?
If I recall correctly, the Abu Ghraib prison story was being investigated by the Army back in January as soon as they found out about it, but the media didn't report on it until a few months ago. Suspicious timing or just time to report it after the investigation was complete?
Now we have this story, where the theft of top secret documents was being investigated, and then after the investigation is complete and documents retrieved, the results are released.
Since when has the spiking of news and the timed release of it become more important than just releasing the news of an investigation once the investigation concludes?
-PJ
Its the timing of the missile strike, not the nature of the grand jury!