Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Lord of the Rings Will – and Must – Be Remade
Tech Central Station ^ | July 16, 2004 | Doug Kern

Posted on 07/20/2004 12:26:58 PM PDT by quidnunc

More Lord of the Rings movies — oh, yesss, preciousss, we wantsss them.

And within the next twenty or thirty years, we'll get them. Children who watched the Lord of the Rings trilogy will take their own children to a complete remake of the Lord of the Rings trilogy. It's inevitable.

Most great movies will never be remade. We will never see remakes of The Godfather, or Gone with the Wind, or even Star Wars. But Lord of the Rings is different.

Why? Consider these five reasons.

• The pre-existing fame of the LOTR novels prevents the actors in the LOTR trilogy from dominating the roles they played.

No sane actor would dare to recreate the role of Vito Corleone; the role is bound up too tightly with the performance of Marlon Brando. Similarly, what actress can hope to compete with Vivian Leigh's Scarlett O'Hara? But in the current LOTR trilogy, no actor consumes his role so completely. The finest performance in LOTR (Gollum notwithstanding) may have come from Ian McKellan as Gandalf. Yet, much as I enjoyed his performance, I can think of several actors who could have done as good a job portraying Gandalf: Sean Connery, Brian Blessed, Derek Jacobi, Anthony Hopkins, Michael Caine, Patrick Stewart — the list goes on. The major characters in LOTR are so densely textured in the books — and yet so indelibly etched into the minds of Tolkien's fans, after decades of reading and re-reading the novels — that the performances of the leads in the current trilogy seem like interpretations of the characters, rather than definitions. Moreover, Peter Jackson's direction emphasized plot, rather than characterization, thus allowing room for future actors to place their own imprints on the characters in a way that would be impossible in other remakes.

-snip-

(Excerpt) Read more at techcentralstation.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Extended News; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: lotr
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-140 last
To: quidnunc

Oh, Geez! So, I guess this isn't the last we've seen of that Hobbit Hole thread.


121 posted on 07/20/2004 4:35:11 PM PDT by The Scorpion King
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: discostu

Hear! Hear!! What you said!!


122 posted on 07/20/2004 4:44:48 PM PDT by Ladysmith (Morality anchored to the 'definitions' of man is not anchored at all. - Petronski)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc

Can we get Ralph Bakshi to finish his version of LOTR?


123 posted on 07/20/2004 5:21:18 PM PDT by valkyrieanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Scorpion King

Have you been to the chat side recently? We're well into our thirteenth thread.


124 posted on 07/20/2004 5:24:37 PM PDT by JenB (Colorado or Bust: 9 Days)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc; Marie Antoinette

Ring


125 posted on 07/20/2004 5:34:08 PM PDT by Big Giant Head ( < Roast Chicken?!?>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StoneColdGOP
and an Aragorn with broader shoulders and a deeper voice

YES! Worst cast of the entire project, IMO.

126 posted on 07/20/2004 6:00:22 PM PDT by Big Giant Head ( < Roast Chicken?!?>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: tallhappy

What?

That said, this is a totally not-necessary subject, wasted band width, and I guess the 'already a remake' comment fits in pretty nicely.


127 posted on 07/20/2004 6:05:12 PM PDT by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: StoneColdGOP
Peter Jackson got it as right as anyone could. Any attempt at a remake would far, far short of the mark.

Jackson did as good a job as could be done within his time constraints of not having any movie go above 3 hours.

There is such a wealth of material there, though, that somebody without time constraints, producing a 30-hour series, could mine

128 posted on 07/20/2004 6:28:40 PM PDT by SauronOfMordor (That which does not kill me had better be able to run away damn fast.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Warren; HairOfTheDog; ecurbh; JenB
Okay, I haven't seen the movie, but betcha it can't compare to a Michael Moore movie.


129 posted on 07/20/2004 6:35:16 PM PDT by Corin Stormhands (I'm going on vacation in 10 days...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah

How about ......... James CARVILLE??


130 posted on 07/20/2004 7:00:27 PM PDT by ZULU
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: bellas_sister

It'll never happen. Tolkein sold the rights to Saul Zaentz. Zaentz will never allow a competing version.


131 posted on 07/20/2004 9:07:46 PM PDT by Deb (Hey, Sen. Kerry...why the long face?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: fishtank

Amen and Amen


132 posted on 07/20/2004 9:17:05 PM PDT by enigo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Foxfire4
FOX, you are one sick Huan puppy to have come up with that.

Although The Silmarillion is a series of tales, they are loosely connected enough to make into a few movies. Age by Age maybe?
133 posted on 07/20/2004 9:29:06 PM PDT by Right_Handed_Writer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: AnAmericanMother

Occam's Razor is never any fun, though.

I have heard what you are saying before. I think it was derived from something Christopher Tolkein said. However, as I remember it, CT said Bombadil was a bedtime story, but he didn't know whether he pre-dated the history of Middle Earth.


134 posted on 07/21/2004 3:37:42 AM PDT by NCSteve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: 300winmag
Seriesly though, a remake of LOTR doesn't stand a chance of being made unless a director can convince a movie studio that he can out-Jackson Jackson. It wasn't the special effects or grand locations that made the movie, but the heart that went in to it by everyone from Jackson on down.

That is the issue. PJ produced a classic. We can and do debate some of his choices, but his LOTR will stand the test of time. Sooner or later, someone will be tempted to try again but the bar is set pretty high. FWIW, I think Hollywood will do it, if only because PJ didn't throw in any sex and nudity. One of the leftcoast dimbulbs will decide the story needs a more "mature" and "sophisticated" treatment.

135 posted on 07/21/2004 3:58:48 AM PDT by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Right_Handed_Writer
'Tweren't me; I only wish I could pull that off. And now you've made me start picturing a Beren & Luthien movie in my head, just for the horse-sized dog, who's probably my favorite character in the whole thing. (I have a friend who told me that, semi-divine nature or not, Huan is OBVIOUSLY still a dog: he can't wrap his little canine mind around the concept of "STAY!" :-)
136 posted on 07/21/2004 4:43:07 AM PDT by Foxfire4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: NCSteve
Well, Tolkien started putting his universe together in the trenches in WWI, and Christopher Tolkien wasn't born until 1924. But the Hobbit wasn't published until 1936, so it seems as though the bedtime stories would predate FOTR.

It's o.k., though, as C.S. Lewis has George MacDonald tell his narrator in The Great Divorce, poets (in that case, Keats) oftentimes aren't entirely clear about what they meant.

137 posted on 07/21/2004 4:49:23 AM PDT by AnAmericanMother (. . . Ministrix of ye Chace (recess appointment), TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc
I remember the much-touted SF Channel remake of "Dune" which made a total botch of a very under-rated movie.

I'd guess 9 of 10 remakes are inferior to the originals.

Splashy special effects are no match for good acting and screenwriting.

OK, The Day the Earth Stood Still is now known to be a retelling of the Passion of Christ, but few know it was based on a pulp short-story entitled "Farewell to the Master" by Harry Bates...in which only the names of Klaatu and Gort were retained. And Forbidden Planet is Shakespeare's Tempest; who would dare remake it?

Let's see a decent full-length Atlas Shrugged, or Asimov's Foundation trilogy (without the mangling applied to "I, Robot" first, OK?

Let it be.

--Boris

138 posted on 07/21/2004 7:00:31 AM PDT by boris (The deadliest weapon of mass destruction in history is a Leftist with a word processor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Foxfire4

Did you come up with that yourself? It's great!


139 posted on 07/21/2004 8:35:28 AM PDT by StoneColdGOP (Nothing is Bush's fault... Nothing is Bush's fault... Nothing is Bush's fault...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: Foxfire4

This is a good discussion on Tom:

http://www.glyphweb.com/arda/t/tombombadil.html#riddle


140 posted on 07/21/2004 8:40:01 AM PDT by StoneColdGOP (Nothing is Bush's fault... Nothing is Bush's fault... Nothing is Bush's fault...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-140 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson