Posted on 07/20/2004 12:03:35 PM PDT by Oeconomicus
Part of the ongoing Clinton 'strategery' to make sure eff'n fails...
hmmmmm??
Wow! I tuned to CNN to see how they were handling this at the top of the hour. It was their first story. They showed the Hastert quote vs. Daschle's "give him the benefit of the doubt" and "the timing of this leak is very suspicious."
But the CNN reporter said that these missing documents are the highest level of classification, "code-numbered documents" that are higher than the "Q-classifiction" documents. For these to be missing is very, very serious. I think that it's been kept quiet by the FBI, not to cover up, but to make Sandy crack and admit who he gave these documents to. It simply doesn't wash that he took top,top secret documents, at least twice, and then lost them.
I wanna hear and see Berger squeal like a stuck pig. Hopefully there will be more than just him who is indicted.
Is this a theory or a known fact? If the latter, I don't think it is known by many.
What was this man thinking????? I've been to NSA places, and you can't even take a pee there without someone watching you, much less documents!!!!........
Yeah, but this IS Debka...
If it hadn't appeared in a number of other sources I wouldn't have even clicked on it.
So was he purposefully caught as a general plot to insure a Kerry loss thru association? How does one stuff things in their socks inadvertantly?
Oh come now. Who among us hasn't stole national security documents? Who here can say that they haven't shoved a top secret document down their pants? /smirk
Keep in mind that this is from DEBKA which has proven itself wrong more often than right. However, Destro might be be interested in this tidbit.
Liar, Liar, pants for hire!
What I want to know is whether MMM will now make a Post-it note dispenser in the form of a bobble-head Sandy Berger doll with the pieces of paper apparently coming out of his pants. Seems like a natural, sign me up.
Get real folks. Everyone knows this was timed to deflect attention away from Iraq, Iran, the Saudis, Halliburton, girlie men....have I missed anything?
***sigh***
It's just about sox.
Said the same on another thread. Never count the Clintons out. This is right up their alley. The tipoff will be if and how often the press mentions the Kerry connection.
Now I hop on FR this afternoon and everyone is talking about SOCKS.
Which is it, pants, socks, or both. I read someone denied he shoved them in his socks, does that mean he DID shove them in the pants?
Pets's Wife said: "***sigh***
It's just about sox."
Right you are, PW, Sandy Bergler and his Sox Life is a private matter! Cheers!
Maybe he's dyslexic? Clinton's note told him to "Put a sock in it" not "Put it in your sock!"......He also put things down his pants and jacket. I wonder, did the FBI tell him to "Take off your pants and jacket."???
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.