Posted on 07/20/2004 12:03:14 PM PDT by epluribus_2
snip
In a statement issued late Monday, Berger said the removal of those papers was unintentional. But law enforcement sources told CNN that some of the papers he is said to have taken from the National Archives were stuffed into his socks as well as other parts of his clothing.
That allegation drew sharp responses from two of Berger's associates. President Clinton's former spokesman, Joe Lockhart, said Berger "categorically denies that he ever took documents and stuffed them in his socks.
snip
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
How ironic. Berger stuffs documents in his socks........his former boss stuffs socks into his.........well................boxers or briefs? I can't recall.
Yeah, me too. LOL.
Speaking of "security leaks", Bill Richardson, as former Secretary of Energy, shouldn't be out-front in defense of Sandy Berger since his Los Alamos installation was leaking like a sieve during his tenure. We never did get to the bottom of that one (you never do where the Clinton's are involved).
F_D said:
"I did not have socksual relations with that document."
ROTFLMAO! Cheers!
I always strive to brighten another's day!
ROTFL!!! You owe me a new keyboard!
A Freeper on another thread christened this "Soxgate".
What do you want to bet that the clerk at the National Archive, in deference to Berger's former position, didn't react to Berger's pilfering & note-taking UNTIL AFTER he/she was asked to account for some missing originals? It also sounds like Berger may have received a courtesy call to "bring the stuff in, and all will be forgotten," but couldn't produce all the goods. This investigation has gone on too long. He needs to be charged with something.
I would expect that some foreign intelligence agency is well aware of Berger's laxness when it comes to security, and they probably have a man on his neighborhood rubbish removal detail. And if they had one then, they still have one now, because former NSA's and CIA directors get called-in from time-to-time to offer-up their recollections on old intelligence assessments.
Vast right wing conspiracy theories?
see Post # 147.
The New York Times: (212) 556-7652
The New York Post: (212) 930-8000
ABC: 212-456-7777
CBS: 212-975-4321
NBC: 212-664-4444
CNN: 404-237-0234
Fox:1-888-369-4762
NY York Daily News (212) 210-NEWS
Bill O'Reily
E-mail: oreilly@foxnews.com
Sean Hannity
hannity@foxnews.com
Alan Colmes
colmes@foxnews.com
Phylis Schlafly
eagle@eagleforum.org
Oliver North
http://www.northamerican.com/-cybercall/pg-call.htm
Janet Parshall, conservative talk show host
(703) 276-8597
Fax: (703) 516-7212
E-Mail us at: info@jpamerica.com
Brit Hume
Special Report with Brit Hume
Special@foxnews.com
Hugh Hewitt (conservative talk show host/columnist)
http://www.hughhewitt.com/
Michael Medved (conservative talk show host/columnist)
http://www.michaelmedved.com/contact.shtml
I got these addresses from Media Research Center,
http://www.mediaresearch.org/MediaAddresses/mediaaddresses.asp#If%20the
Atlanta Journal-Constitution
e-mail: conedit@ajc.com
Houston Chronicle
e-mail: viewpoints@chron.com
Miami Herald
e-mail: HeraldEd@herald.com
The New York Times
letters@nytimes.com
Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
e-mail: letters@post-gazette.com
USA Today
e-mail: editor@usatoday.com
The Wall Street Journal
e-mail: letter.editor@edit.wsj.com
The Washington Post
e-mail: Letterstoed@washpost.com
The Washington Times
e-mail: wtnews@wt.infi.net
Now that Berger is stepping down from the Kerry campaign, how much do you want to bet that the next spin line will be: Hasn't he suffered enough?"
-PJ
I've become convinced that he's gotten as far as he is by being a cutthroat. I'm assuming he knows where the bodies are all buried and he's not afraid to leverage it as needed. He's like a behind-the-scenes McCain.
According to this article, Joe Lockhart is advising Berger. He's hurting if this is the best adviser he can get.
I guess my paranoia is showing?
Joe Lockhart always struck me as a guy that would fit in with the Soprano family, so maybe it's not such a dumb move.
The Clintons are in "denial mode" and they're good at it. But at the same time, they've hurt John F*ckin' and will do him even more damage if he doesn't get its not his job to win in November. They've made that brutally clear. Now there is no question who knows the Democratic Party, lock, stock and barrel.
knows = own
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.