Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/20/2004 11:20:09 AM PDT by EggsAckley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last
To: EggsAckley

Kerry & Edwards were playing 'touch' football??


35 posted on 07/20/2004 11:39:02 AM PDT by Krodg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EggsAckley

Take a breath. Two lines of thunderstorms came up in the afternoon - one from northeast of chicago through central indiana, and one from Grand rapids down towards dayton. This make it next to impossible to get any air traffic eastbound, and all mdw (I don't know the O'Hare status then)traffic was ground-stopped due to weather. Ask me how i know :-)

United may have handled the aftermath of your flight differently, but they're not out to get you. This sort of stuff costs them tons of money. Planes can't fly through thunderstorms.

The easiest way to check on the atc status is via the FAA's site www.fly.faa.gov where you will get a real-time update on any ground stops. It's a little tricky when you're on a plane, but if it makes you feel any better, try calling a friend who is online. Just remember that what the site reports is a snapshot of current delays and not a forecast.


37 posted on 07/20/2004 11:40:53 AM PDT by nj_pilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EggsAckley
It was bad enough being trapped like sardines in that 707, with very little air, no water, and not allowed to get up and move around.

WOW! You were in a 707?

Haven't seen one of those babies since I was in Miami in '94.

It wasn't "weather related" it was "whether related." "Whether" it would make it or not.

38 posted on 07/20/2004 11:43:00 AM PDT by N. Theknow (Kennedy family legacy - can't skipper a boat, can't fly, can't drive, can't ski)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EggsAckley
It was bad enough being trapped like sardines in that 707, with very little air, no water, and not allowed to get up and move around.

WOW! You were in a 707?

Haven't seen one of those babies since I was in Miami in '94.

It wasn't "weather related" it was "whether related." "Whether" it would make it or not.

40 posted on 07/20/2004 11:43:35 AM PDT by N. Theknow (Kennedy family legacy - can't skipper a boat, can't fly, can't drive, can't ski)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EggsAckley
Sound like the was a "weatherman alert" . . . You remember the weatherman back in the early 1970s, don't you, Judy? Oh, well . . . Time marches on.

I flew into O'Hare in the 1980's and our plane has to circle the airport for nearly an hour while a severe weather system cleared out of the area. Outside the windows we could see other planes lined up and circling like lost birds. Lightning was flashing all around the plane and the clouds would turn bright pink when another blast went off.

Hint: Severe weather near Chicago may be avoided by taking another airline.

46 posted on 07/20/2004 12:03:13 PM PDT by ex-Texan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EggsAckley

Funny thing is, I was in Illinois Friday, driving across mid-IL to Hannibal, and could see very dark skies north of us.

Why is that funny? Because I live in GA, and had never been to IL before last week, but here's your thread, and there I was.

funny


47 posted on 07/20/2004 12:03:42 PM PDT by eyespysomething (Virtue is learned at a mother's knee...and vices at other joints.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EggsAckley
Eggs, avoid United like the plague. Their service is terrible. Recently my family and I have been using the new Independence Air, and they have consistently been a breath of fresh air as far as caring for the customer. We use Dulles Airport (Northern Virginia) and their security is pretty tight. Normally only the ticketed passenger is allowed to take the little shuttle bus to the gate. My wife is deaf, and on both occassions when I was with her, the Independence Air rep took the time to recognize the situation, and without a prompt from me, offered to give me a special pass so I could go with her to the gate. Noone at Dulles has ever done that (and we've used Dulles a lot).
52 posted on 07/20/2004 12:16:45 PM PDT by COBOL2Java (Kerry Lied. Soldiers Died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EggsAckley
After four and a half hours of sitting on the tarmac we FINALLY departed. The explanation of "weather" was laughable; how could a weather system that no one saw hold up so many planes of so many sizes heading out for so many destinations?

Aircraft travel at nearly 500 MPH. Weather can ground whole groups of aircraft because congested airports like O'Hare have narrow departure corridors. Just because you cannot see it, does not mean it does not exist.

Just for a moment, think logically. Why would the crew POSSIBLY lie? Do you think THEY like sitting there for 6 hours?

I am an airline pilot, and I have waited 4.5 hours before for weather, in much the same way you describe. This is an ATC and "Act of G-d" kind of thing. Your choices usually are:

1. Go back to the gate, and loose your place in line. For this long a wait, it indicates you likely would NOT have arrived at your destination THAT day.

2. Wait in line and hope that ATC lifts the in-trail spacing over the corridor you are using.

3. Refile your flight plan over a different corridor.

Without question, your crew weighed ALL those possibilities.

I am always amazed at how meek people become when they encounter severe weather in an aircraft, and how little they understand the dangers and the precautions taken before flying.

No one was picking on you.
55 posted on 07/20/2004 12:26:21 PM PDT by safisoft
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EggsAckley
A weather system could cause a disruption like that for several reasons:
  1. The entire system is groaning at the seams at certain hours. Every airline overbooks the runways, that is, you can only launch a plane every 2-3 minutes max (and recover planes at the same pace) but if there are 15 lines at an airport every one of them has seven flight departing within five minutes of 8 AM... five minutes of noon... etc.

  2. Just because the weather is fine where YOU are doesn't mean it's fine at the destination airport. Air Traffic Control now issues ground holds, rather than air holds, when that's the case. (Ground holds are safer and more economical). And because the system's so tightly packed, if a field is closed for a couple hours (rare) or has to slow down its operating tempo due to weather (common), everybody going there has to wait... and that's not all.

  3. Ground holds ripple through the system. A ground hold at, say, SFO, due to morning fog, has second and third order effects, and somebody is on hold at JFK because he can't get into DFW or ORD (O'Hare), because the ramps are all backed up with holding SFO traffic.

  4. The bad weather doesn't even have to be at an airport. This time of year the midwest is full of big, convective weather -- thunderstorms in their birthing, prime or dying stages. You can't fly into a thunderstorm (well, you can't count on doing it more than once, so prudent pilots give them lots of room, and FAA regs and airline ops manuals forbid flying there, where common sense already says don't go). So everybody diverts to hell and gone around the thunderbumpers. This means the controllers have their hands full with planes off the usual tracks, and the controllers' primary mission is always to keep two planes from occupying the same space at the same time (which I why I personally appreciate them) and to keep the planes from merging with the terrain (ditto). This time of year everybody will also be asking the controllers for a higher or lower altitude because there's plenty of bumps. So they are some busy, busy, busy guys and girls. And that slows 'em down -- when they start getting antsy about safety, they slow things down to keep a handle on.

  5. Plus, all this diverting takes time and makes planes more late at their destinations than they would be otherwise. (No choice in the matter: if you didn't go around the storm, you would never arrive at your destination. You can't win the Guinness Book record for lateness, you can only tie). That compounds the problem because you now have planes on the ramp when they are supposed to be turned around and gone, while there are waiting pax in the terminals, frutrated, and planes scattered willy-nilly around the ramp waiting for this and that. There may be no gate open for your airline... so now you sit in the plane for another half hour or forty minutes which feels like forever when you are already late.

So, even though you feel like you were gang-raped by United Airlines, rest assured that the aircrew and the gate agents (low-paid people who take way more abuse than I would ever consider doing) are pretty beat up too. The senior management of the airline (which is bankrupt, and is likely to move into liquidation before 2004 is out) may be responsible for some of this, but the people you see on the planes and in the terminals are getting beat up by the same circumstances as you.

The airline isn't doing this (making you wait) of its own volition, and the 4+ hours you were stuck on the ground are a nightmare for everybody on their side of the deal, too. In fact, if your flight had any chance to make money, that hold erased it just for what the extra cost of wages was (pilots and FAs are hourly employees -- most travellers assume they're salaried). I don't know what equipment you were on (it wasn't a 707 -- those antiques are hauling cargo around the third world, or being converted into pots and pans by scrap dealers). But assuming the usual domestic 737 with two pilots and four FAs the airline probably ate $12,000 in salary and bennies on your flight. You know what you paid for a ticket and how many people were on the plane -- now you see why United is financially paws up?

If the hold had been longer, it would have been worse (for you and the airline) because they would have had to call in another crew. Since fatigue has been cited as a causal factor in accidents, strict crew rest and duty hours rules have come into effect. If they call in a reserve crew, they wind up paying two crews... plus you have to wait while the reserve crew briefs-in on the flight. FAs can pretty much step into the position cold, but pilots have to know certain facts about the plane, the weather and the route before they go.

One thing the lines have done to make better on time stats, as these holds become longer and more frequent, is increase the "official" length of legs by anywhere from 15 minutes to an hour. People are more concerned about arriving when they are promised, than about how much time it takes to fly.

The one thing the captain might have done to make your long stay on the tarmac more palatable is to permit a beverage service. The problem with that is, if the controllers tell him "OK, roll" when the service is ongoing, he has to say, "stand by" while the FAs put the carts away, winkle out any pax who have gone into the lavatories, and get everybody (including the FAs) belted in again. If he's not ready to roll when the controller green-lights him, he may have to say, "unable," and then somebody else goes and he winds up, if he's unlucky, at the back of the queue again.

The bottom line is: more people flying, and paying less, means that flying will be more congested and more hassle. Most people buying airline tickets are bottom feeders price wise. Most people will not spend $50 extra for a direct flight, but they will bitch forever about the airline that "forces" them to change planes. Therefore, very few airlines try to sell service and those that do (Midwest Express, for one) usually go blooey.

The way I see this shaking out is with two or three big bankruptcies, and then the market settling on higher prices. I'm not suggesting airline execs are blameless for the bankruptcies, the majors (especially American and United) have been run by inept kleptocracies for years.

But a nightmare like you had could happen to pax on any line -- even the best run (in the USA, probably Southwest, still).

d.o.l.

Criminal Number 18F

57 posted on 07/20/2004 12:29:54 PM PDT by Criminal Number 18F
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EggsAckley

I rarely encounter problems on departure. My problems usually occur on arrival. 3 times in the last year (out of 5 trips), we take off on time, but on landing, we sit in front of the gate for half an hour waiting for someone to direct the plane to the jetway. Were we not expected? Or did we just land at a bad time?

Also, I consider all domestic airlines equally bad, so it doesn't really matter to me who I fly. However, I will NEVER take a flight which connects through Kansas City. Last December, I gatechecked my carry-on, since the first leg was on a tiny Canadair plane. When we arrived, they sent all gatechecked luggage through with the rest of the baggage! So, I had to go outside the secured boarding area to get my carryon, then come back through security to wait for my next leg.


58 posted on 07/20/2004 12:37:02 PM PDT by treadstone71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EggsAckley

They kidnap you to the tarmac so that you can not take a competitors flight to your destination.


59 posted on 07/20/2004 12:37:47 PM PDT by Pylot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EggsAckley

I would like to know how you got stuck on a "707" when no domestic passenger carrier has used them in over 15 years. Were you in a time warp too?


61 posted on 07/20/2004 12:49:36 PM PDT by scooter2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EggsAckley

I've flown into and out of O'Hare every month for 2 years. My flights are rarely on time. After a while, you just expect it.


62 posted on 07/20/2004 12:50:13 PM PDT by ncdrumr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EggsAckley
Consider yourself lucky it was only 4 ½ hours!

Let me tell you my sorry tale about why the Mrs. and I will never fly United!
We were flying back to Harrisburg from the left coast. (This was back in summer of 1995.)
We were an hour late taking off from Portland Oregon (due to the weather!) and by the time we landed in O’Hare we had 20 minutes to get from one end of the airport to the other to make our connecting flight. Which the overhead monitors assured us was “on schedule”!
Well we made it, and arrived at the gate, huffing and puffing only to find out that our connecting flight was still circling high overhead and couldn’t land because there was a “disabled” plane at the gate. Why they couldn’t land our plane at another empty gate or tow the disabled plane somewhere else was anybody’s guess but that’s the story we were told by the gate attendant.
Finally, after 1 ½ hours, they towed the disabled plane to parts unknown and permitted our plane to land.
They un-boarded (it that a word?) the plane and then announced over the PA system that they would begin boarding as soon as they get the plane cleaned and re-stocked.
Another hour later, they finally announced that our flight was ready for boarding. It is now 11PM (Chicago time) and we were supposed to have landed in Harrisburg two hours ago.
We got settled into our seats and taxied out to the waiting line for take-off. The pilot announced that we were 14th in line and it should only be about a 30 minute wait. True to his word, 28 minutes later, he announced that we were next in line and would the flight attendants please be seated for take-off.
We then taxied out onto the runway, straightened out and just as you heard the engines start to rev up for take off….
The plane goes completely DEAD! no power, no engines, no lights, NO NUTHIN! The co-pilot comes back and announces that we have had a major power failure (no DUH!) and that a ground crew will arrive shortly to fix the problem. Meanwhile, there we are, dead on the runway, traffic building up behind us and not so much as a wisp of air circulating in the fully booked aircraft cabin.
The ground crew does indeed board the plane and proceed to “fix” the problem.

THREE HOURS LATER!!! (I’m not kidding!) The ground crew announces that they are unable to fix the problem and they will have to have this plane towed back to the gate. Amidst groans (and I’m sure plenty of cheers from the passengers in the planes behind us!) they proceed to do so. When we get back to the gate and are connected to gate power again, the flight attendant announces that we will unload from this plane and immediately board an identical plane at the very next gate.
Surprise! Surprise! We do so and in record time no less!
However, the attendant then announces that the flight crew from our old plane had to be “de-briefed” and would not be flying with us on to Harrisburg. Unfortunately, our replacement flight crew was “stuck in traffic” (At 3 in the morning!!!!!) and hadn’t arrived at the terminal yet! So we will have a “short” delay while we wait for the replacement crew to arrive.
Two hours later, our crew finally arrives, we pull away from the gate and taxi out to the waiting line. Then, the pilot announces that “due to a previously disabled plane, blocking the runway earlier this evening” (DUH, I wonder which plane that might have been) our wait in line may be as long an hour.

Finally, at 6:00 AM (Chicago time) we lift off the tarmac and land in Harrisburg an hour later at 6:00 AM (Harrisburg time.)
We were supposed to land in Harrisburg at 10:00 PM the previously evening and we finally made it 8 HOURS later.
What made matters even worse was the attitude of the United employees. No remorse, no apology, NO NUTHIN! It’s as if this was standard operating procedures for United Airlines!

Well, like I said, the Mrs. and I have NEVER flown on United since and we NEVER will!

64 posted on 07/20/2004 12:58:56 PM PDT by cuz_it_aint_their_money (If the Dems want to raise taxes on "the rich", how about a 90% tax on contingency fees? A. Coulter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EggsAckley

It might be a Chicago problem. The last two times I had Southwest flights delayed they were coming out of Chicago.


70 posted on 07/20/2004 1:33:39 PM PDT by Tijeras_Slim (Be a Dollar a Day FReeper, and SMILE when you get your Mastercard bill!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EggsAckley

As a few others have already said, I wouldn't be suprised if there was a weather system that was out there impacting your flight. I had a similar experience, though, in the middle of summer at one of the airports in New York while flying Delta. In that case, we were on the tarmac, the plane was turning into an oven, and the stewardesses were up handing out water to the pax as fast as we could drink it. I wasn't too happy about the situation, but at least the crew left me with the impression that they weren't necessarily enjoying our suffering.

That having been said, the domestic carriers can't really even spell "customer service". If you want a real shock, travel into the country on an airline like Singapore Airlines, and then connect to a cross-US flight on, say, Delta. I was on Raffles/Business class for both legs, and while the Singapore Girls went out of their way to cater to my every need (for the 20+ hours we were cocooned in the plane), the only difference I could detect between Business/First class on Delta and the cattle class was that we got a larger seat and a free beer. Two free beers if you were lucky enough to get a stewardess to notice that you were trying to get her attention. Pathetic.


71 posted on 07/20/2004 1:35:03 PM PDT by kyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EggsAckley
I had a similar experience at Dulles (IAD) ... the vicinity of the airport was reasonably clear, but the routes out to the south and west were blocked by a line of thunderstorms over the Apalachians. The Captain had the decency to explain the situation to us, in detail. They had the further decency to let us off the AC if we wanted to stretch our legs.

This was also United.

YMMV

75 posted on 07/20/2004 2:09:26 PM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EggsAckley

Greyhound.


78 posted on 07/20/2004 2:32:54 PM PDT by Old Professer (Interests in common are commonly abused.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: EggsAckley
I've had some experience with delays in Chicago. Sometimes it isn't the weather there, it's weather in their destination cities that screw up the whole system.

One day, though, after the plane we were supposed to fly arrived very late, we begged the folks to just let us get on and take off because we could see the storm coming toward us. They said "no, we have to clean the plane." We all yelled "we don't care! Let's go! Do you see that big cloud coming at us?!"

Well, rules are rules. They cleaned the plane, delaying us an additional 20 minutes. We boarded, and sat there while the storm came overhead. They evacuated the tower and the ground crew, moved everyone away from the windows inside, and left us on the plane while a tornado marched across the tarmac. That took hours to unscrew.

Oh, yes, it was United. Government contract carrier.

79 posted on 07/20/2004 2:34:56 PM PDT by Not A Snowbird (Monthly Donors NEVER need tons click "co-ordinating")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson